should be sent to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be sent to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating the destination or recipient of something that needs to be dispatched or delivered. Example: "All completed forms should be sent to the administration office by the end of the week."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Comments should be sent to [email protected]

University of California, Berkeley

Inquiries should be sent to Yuri Shevchuk.

Columbia University

Questions should be sent to [email protected]

Columbia University

They should be sent to P.O.

The New York Times

Applications should be sent to [email protected].

The New York Times

Applications should be sent to [email protected] by July 3rd.

The Economist

Bug reports and comments should be sent to Allan Willms.

Yale University

All technology disclosures should be sent to the TLO.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Once complete, it should be sent to Central Payroll.

Harvard University

Such documentation should be sent to gsas-studentaffairs [at] columbia.edu.edu

Columbia University

GRE scores should be sent to Institution Code 0550.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be sent to", ensure that the recipient and the item being sent are clearly identified to avoid confusion.

Common error

Avoid using "should be sent to" without specifying a clear recipient. Instead of "The document should be sent to", specify "The document should be sent to the HR department".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be sent to" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating where something is expected or required to be directed. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms its proper use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

54%

News & Media

44%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be sent to" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed passive construction used to indicate the intended recipient or destination of an item or information. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and broad applicability. Predominantly found in academic and news contexts, it maintains a neutral register suitable for both formal and informal communication. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity regarding both the item and the recipient to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

must be directed to

Emphasizes the necessity of directing something to a specific recipient.

needs to be forwarded to

Highlights the action of forwarding to the intended recipient.

is to be transmitted to

Focuses on the act of transmitting information or items.

ought to be dispatched to

Suggests a duty or obligation to send something.

must be conveyed to

Emphasizes the importance of conveying something to someone.

is required to be submitted to

Highlights the mandatory submission to a specific entity.

needs to be mailed to

Specifies that the method of sending is through the mail.

should be routed to

Indicates the path or direction something should take.

is to be transferred to

Focuses on the act of transferring something to another party.

must be delivered to

Emphasizes the requirement of delivering something to a specific location or person.

FAQs

How to use "should be sent to" in a sentence?

Use "should be sent to" to indicate where something needs to be dispatched or delivered, like in: "All applications "should be sent to" the admissions office".

What can I say instead of "should be sent to"?

You can use alternatives like "must be directed to", "needs to be forwarded to", or "is to be transmitted to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "should be sent to" or "should send to"?

"Should be sent to" is the correct passive construction, indicating something needs to be dispatched. "Should send to" is grammatically incorrect in this context.

What's the difference between "should be sent to" and "must be sent to"?

"Should be sent to" indicates a recommendation or suggestion, while "must be sent to" implies a requirement or obligation.