should be reviewed as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be reviewed as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something needs to be evaluated or assessed in a particular manner or context. Example: "The project outcomes should be reviewed as part of the overall performance evaluation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

Those should be reviewed as well.

The New York Times

Consequently, on welfare grounds, the use of nosebands that cause any constriction of jaw movement should be reviewed as soon as possible.

Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research

It contains definitions of the varieties of cell lines that should be reviewed as well as guidance on record-keeping and storage of stem cell lines.

Duke University

All boards and commissions should be reviewed as well, as this state has created an abundant (and sometimes redundant) number of commissions (which often serve as retirement perks for termed out legislators).

Los Angeles Times

And as such, the current advisory limit for concentration of As in drinking water should be reviewed as well as policies on the promotion and support of household water arsenic remediation activities.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

This study evaluates the time intervals over which standards should be reviewed as a function of the standards' dynamics.

Computer Standards & Interfaces

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

And I honestly don't think these things should be reviewed at all — especially as a gadget.

TechCrunch

These laws should be reviewed and rewritten as necessary.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Scientific models that guide restoration/management protocols should be reviewed periodically as new data become available.

Forest Ecology and Management

When assessing change in aortic diameter, previous CT-scans should be reviewed simultaneously as a routine to exclude interobserver variability.

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

The key recommendation from the review is that the question should be reviewed again as part of the strategic defence review (SDR).

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should be reviewed as" to introduce a formal or structured evaluation process, especially when specific guidelines or standards are relevant.

Common error

Avoid using "should be reviewed as" in very casual or informal settings where simpler phrases like "look at" or "check" would be more appropriate. The phrase is relatively formal and using it in an informal context might sound unnatural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be reviewed as" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating a recommendation or necessity for evaluating something from a specific perspective. It sets the stage for a structured assessment. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability and provides numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should be reviewed as" is a phrase used to recommend or require evaluation of something from a specific perspective, often indicating a structured assessment process. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability, highlighting its prevalence across diverse contexts, including science, news, and academia. While grammatically correct and widely used, it is best suited for neutral to formal settings. Remember to clearly define the evaluation criteria for clarity, and avoid overusing it in casual conversations. Alternatives such as "ought to be assessed as" or "must be evaluated as" offer subtle variations in emphasis, as discussed in the related phrases section.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be assessed as

Emphasizes obligation or moral correctness in the evaluation process.

must be evaluated as

Highlights the necessity and importance of the evaluation.

needs to be examined as

Focuses on the requirement for a thorough examination.

has to be considered as

Indicates that the evaluation is a mandatory step in a process.

should be regarded as

Emphasizes a particular perspective or viewpoint in the assessment.

could be interpreted as

Suggests a potential interpretation or understanding.

might be seen as

Presents the evaluation as a possible but not certain viewpoint.

may be classified as

Focuses on categorizing something based on evaluation.

is worth re-evaluating as

Highlights the value of reassessing something from a specific angle.

warrants further inspection as

Suggests that something requires additional, closer examination.

FAQs

How can I use "should be reviewed as" in a sentence?

Use "should be reviewed as" to indicate that something needs to be evaluated from a specific perspective or under certain criteria. For example, "The project's budget "should be reviewed as" a percentage of total revenue".

What are some alternatives to "should be reviewed as"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be assessed as", "must be evaluated as", or "needs to be examined as" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "should be reviewed as" grammatically correct?

Yes, "should be reviewed as" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard structure for passive voice constructions and is widely accepted in both formal and informal writing.

What's the difference between "should be reviewed as" and "should be considered as"?

"Should be reviewed as" implies a more formal and structured evaluation process, whereas "should be considered as" suggests a more general or less rigorous assessment. Review often involves specific criteria or guidelines, while consider is a broader term.