should be reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

"should be reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to suggest that something is in need of evaluation or consideration. For example, "The school's policy on dress code should be reviewed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

These should be reviewed annually.

The Guardian

Those should be reviewed as well.

The New York Times

This case should be reviewed.

University of California, Berkeley

All convictions should be reviewed.

Stanford University

Their sentences should be reviewed too.

The Guardian

What kinds of restaurants should be reviewed?

The Washington Post

• The Victim's Charter should be reviewed, particularly for racist incidents.

The Guardian

Moss found their dismissal should be reviewed by the government.

The Guardian

* Holdings in 401 k)'s should be reviewed.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

To get the most accurate picture, a range of other measures should be reviewed.

Huffington Post

The courts ruled that the decision should be reviewed.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should be reviewed" to politely suggest that a document, policy, or process needs evaluation or improvement. It implies a recommendation rather than a demand.

Common error

While "should be reviewed" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to active voice where appropriate for more directness: "The committee should review the proposal" instead of "The proposal should be reviewed by the committee."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be reviewed" functions as a modal verb phrase. It expresses a recommendation or suggestion that something needs to be examined, evaluated, or reconsidered. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is correct and usable in various writing contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be reviewed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression in English to suggest the need for evaluation or reconsideration. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across diverse contexts. It is most commonly found in news, science, and academic writings, maintaining a neutral to professional tone. While direct and useful, writers should avoid overusing the passive voice and consider active alternatives for a more direct style. The phrase's versatile nature and clarity make it a valuable tool in professional and academic communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be examined

Emphasizes a moral obligation or advisability in examining something.

needs to be evaluated

Highlights the necessity of assessing the value or quality of something.

requires assessment

Focuses on the formal requirement for an evaluation.

warrants scrutiny

Suggests that something deserves close and careful examination, often due to potential issues.

merits inspection

Implies that something is worthy of being inspected or checked.

must be checked

Indicates a strong necessity for verification or confirmation.

demands a reassessment

Highlights the urgency and importance of re-evaluating something.

is worth reconsidering

Suggests that something would benefit from being thought about again.

calls for an audit

Specifically suggests a formal examination of records or accounts.

is ripe for revision

Suggests that something is ready and suitable for being revised or updated.

FAQs

How do I use "should be reviewed" in a sentence?

Use "should be reviewed" to indicate that something needs to be evaluated or reconsidered. For example, "The contract "should be reviewed" by a lawyer before signing".

What's a more formal alternative to "should be reviewed"?

Formal alternatives include phrases like "ought to be examined" or "requires assessment", which convey a stronger sense of obligation or necessity.

Is "should be reviewed" correct?

Yes, "should be reviewed" is grammatically correct and widely used in English to suggest evaluation or reconsideration. It's commonly used in both formal and informal contexts.

What is the difference between "should be reviewed" and "must be reviewed"?

"Should be reviewed" suggests a recommendation or advisability, while "must be reviewed" implies a stronger requirement or necessity. The choice depends on the level of urgency and importance of the review.