should be retracted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be retracted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something, such as a statement or claim, needs to be withdrawn or taken back. Example: "Due to the inaccuracies in the report, the statement should be retracted to maintain credibility."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

If they were never fully reviewed, and only seen by Matson, then it is not unreasonable to suggest that these papers should be retracted.

The Guardian

I put this to Daniel Salsbury, Deputy Executive Editor for PNAS, along with other questions about whether the original paper should be retracted.

The Guardian

A string of senior Labour MPs lined up to criticise Livingstone, including Luciana Berger, the shadow mental health secretary, who said the comments were unacceptable, appalling and should be retracted.

The Guardian

Independent experts have been asked by the BMJ's editor, Dr Fiona Godlee, to advise on whether the papers should be retracted, in response to a call from Professor Rory Collins, joint head of the clinical trials service unit at Oxford University.

The Guardian

"History teaches us," says the Secretary for State, in reply, "that it has sometimes been found necessary to ignore local sentiment or to override racial prejudice in the interest of sound administration, or in order to establish an ethical or political principle," But he goes on to add that whenever the opportunity occurs these assumptions of force should be retracted.

The Economist

"A research paper as riddled with false statements as Lander's 'Heroes of Crispr' would be retracted – it too should be retracted," tweeted Michael Eisen, a UC Berkeley biologist who was so incensed by the anti-Doudna tone of Lander's article that he denounced it on Twitter as "science propaganda at its most repellent".

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

Roger A. Pielke, Jr., whose focus at the University of Colorado is climate in the context of political science, echoed that question, urging the new team at the journal to initiate retraction proceedings, adding: If the charges of "error" and "false claims" are upheld the paper should certainly be retracted.

The New York Times

The Monsanto data as presented are thus inconclusive and should also be retracted.

Environmental Sciences Europe

They must be retracted during beam injection.

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment

Other cellular processes appeared to be retracted.

Plosone

Once said, they can never be retracted.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should be retracted" when indicating that a statement, claim, or published article is inaccurate, misleading, or based on flawed evidence and therefore needs to be formally withdrawn. Ensure the context supports the implication of error or misconduct.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive constructions like "should be retracted" in contexts where active voice would be more direct and impactful. Consider if specifying who should retract the statement would strengthen the sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be retracted" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating a recommendation or necessity for something to be withdrawn or taken back. Ludwig's examples reveal its frequent usage in academic and news contexts, often relating to publications or statements.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

44%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should be retracted" is a versatile phrase used to express the need for withdrawing or correcting information, frequently encountered in scientific, academic, and news-related contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. When writing, consider the context and purpose to ensure clarity and impact, avoiding overuse of passive voice where a more active construction would be stronger. Be mindful of alternative phrasing to convey nuances in obligation or advisability, such as "ought to be withdrawn" or "must be rescinded". Ludwig's examples show its usage across different categories such as Science, News & Media and Wiki, while confirming that it follows standard grammar rules.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be withdrawn

Replaces "should" with "ought to", implying a moral obligation.

needs to be revoked

Substitutes "retracted" with "revoked", suggesting a formal cancellation.

must be rescinded

Uses "rescinded" instead of "retracted", indicating an official annulment.

is recommended for withdrawal

Expresses the suggestion of retraction in a more formal tone.

is advised to be taken back

Phrases the need for retraction as an advisory action.

should be invalidated

Replaces "retracted" with "invalidated", focusing on the lack of validity.

should be disavowed

Replaces "retracted" with "disavowed", meaning to deny responsibility or support for.

is better off being retracted

Emphasizes the benefit of retracting something.

it's best to retract

Offers a general recommendation for retraction.

consider retracting

Presents the idea of retraction as a possibility.

FAQs

How can I use "should be retracted" in a sentence?

You can use "should be retracted" to suggest that something inaccurate or misleading needs to be withdrawn, such as "Due to the inaccuracies, the report "should be retracted"".

What's the difference between "should be retracted" and "must be retracted"?

"Should be retracted" indicates a recommendation or advisability, while "must be retracted" implies a stronger obligation or necessity. The choice depends on the urgency and the authority making the determination.

What can I say instead of "should be retracted"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be withdrawn", "needs to be revoked", or "must be rescinded" depending on the specific context and desired level of formality.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "should be retracted"?

It's appropriate to use "should be retracted" when you believe that information is false, misleading, or based on flawed methodology, and its withdrawal is necessary to maintain accuracy or integrity. For example, in academic publishing or public statements.