should be represented

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be represented" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the necessity or expectation for something to be depicted or included in a certain context. Example: "In the report, all relevant data should be represented clearly to ensure understanding."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But America should be represented.

The New York Times

"Every nook and cranny should be represented".

The New York Times - Science

Northern Ireland should be represented on the advisory panel.

The Guardian - Opinion

David Cameron should be represented by an empty chair.

The Guardian

The community is incredibly diverse and should be represented honestly.

The Guardian

We believe all parties going through divorce should be represented.

Cornell University

"As Scotland's national poet, Edwin's work should be represented beyond Glasgow.

The Guardian - Books

In addition, doctors who work at the center should be represented on the center's board.

The New York Times

Other overseas territories should be represented in parliament too, Paul Nuttall, Ukip's deputy leader said.

The Guardian

We're represented with [independent record] stores, but we should be represented with playlists too".

The Guardian - Tech

All these things are significant, and they should be represented somewhere in this show.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When advocating for fair representation in a group or assembly, use "should be represented" to emphasize the importance of including diverse perspectives and ensuring that all voices are heard.

Common error

While "should be represented" is grammatically sound, overuse of the passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider rephrasing to use active voice when possible for a more direct and impactful statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be represented" functions as an auxiliary verb phrase expressing necessity or recommendation. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used. It indicates that something or someone deserves or requires depiction, inclusion, or portrayal in a certain context.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Academia

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be represented" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that serves to advocate for inclusion, fairness, or accuracy. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, ranging from news and media to scientific and formal communications. The phrase is particularly relevant when emphasizing the necessity of depicting or including diverse perspectives. When writing, remember to consider the impact of the passive voice and explore alternative phrasing when appropriate to make your writing more direct and impactful.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be depicted

Replaces "should" with "ought to", indicating a sense of moral obligation or advisability rather than a strict requirement. Semantic similarity is very high.

should be featured

Focuses on the anticipation of inclusion, highlighting a strong expectation. Semantic similarity is high.

needs to be included

Focuses on the necessity of inclusion, highlighting a requirement. Semantic similarity is high.

must be illustrated

Emphasizes the obligation to illustrate or demonstrate something. The semantic similarity is high when referring to visual representation.

has to be shown

Highlights the requirement of being displayed or presented. Semantic similarity is high.

is required to be displayed

Formally states the necessity for something to be visible or presented. Semantic similarity is high.

is expected to be featured

Implies a high probability or anticipation of inclusion. Semantic similarity is moderate.

warrants inclusion

Suggests that something merits being included based on its importance or relevance. Semantic similarity is moderate.

merits depiction

Indicates that something is worthy of being portrayed or illustrated. Semantic similarity is moderate.

deserves acknowledgment

Shifts the focus to recognition and validation rather than direct representation. Semantic similarity is moderate.

FAQs

How can I use "should be represented" in a sentence?

Use "should be represented" to express the necessity or importance of depicting or including something in a specific context. For instance, "Diverse viewpoints "should be represented" in the committee to ensure a comprehensive decision-making process".

What are some alternatives to "should be represented"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be depicted", "needs to be included", or "must be illustrated" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "should be represented"?

While "should be represented" is in passive voice, it is grammatically correct. However, using the active voice can sometimes make your writing more direct. For example, instead of "Minorities "should be represented"", you could say "The council must represent minorities".

In what contexts is "should be represented" most appropriate?

"Should be represented" is suitable in contexts where you want to emphasize the importance of inclusion, depiction, or fair representation, such as in discussions about diversity, data visualization, or political representation.