should be named

USAGE SUMMARY

"should be named" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are offering advice or making a suggestion about how something should be named. For example, "The bridge that connects the two towns should be named Friendship Bridge."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Some believe it should be named after a province.

The Economist

"Cars should be named other things," she told Martin brightly.

The New Yorker

The structure should be named the 9-11 Tower.

The New York Times

Independent judges should be named and insulated from political pressures.

The New York Times

Therefore, appropriate coefficients for junctions should be named as head change coefficients.

Chemical Engineering Science

Extra point Who do you think should be named coach of the year?

The New York Times

Is there a fear of somehow seeming too crude by naming what should be named?

The New York Times - Arts

If this primer was really about energy, it should be named "The Joule".

The New York Times

If the N.B.A. were measured in eras, one of them should be named after the Spurs.

The New York Times

Paul declined suggestions that it should be named the Mellon gallery.

The Economist

For example, there's very little reason why Wilson College should be named after him.

Princeton University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be named", ensure the context provides a clear reason or justification for the suggested name.

Common error

Overusing passive voice, including "should be named", can make your writing sound vague. Whenever possible, rephrase to use active voice for a more direct and engaging style. For instance, instead of 'The award should be named after her', consider 'We should name the award after her'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be named" functions as a passive voice construction used to express a suggestion or recommendation regarding the naming of something. It implies that there is a good reason or justification for a particular name to be given. This is supported by Ludwig, which confirms its correct usage in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be named" is a common and grammatically correct passive voice construction used to suggest or recommend a name for something. Ludwig's analysis indicates that it is most frequently found in News & Media, Science, and Academic contexts, highlighting its versatility across different registers. While generally neutral in tone, context dictates the level of formality. Remember to be mindful of overusing passive voice, and provide a clear justification whenever suggesting a name using this phrase. With its frequent use across authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian, this phrase is a reliable choice for expressing naming suggestions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be called

Replaces "should" with "ought to", indicating a sense of duty or moral obligation.

would be best named

Indicates a preference for a particular name.

could be designated

Emphasizes the act of formally assigning a name or title.

should be designated as

Highlights the formal process of designation.

might be termed

Suggests a possible name, often implying uncertainty or tentativeness.

could be labeled

Focuses on the action of giving a label or identifier.

might be referred to as

Uses a more verbose structure, suitable for formal contexts.

it's advisable to name

Introduces an element of advisability or recommendation.

it is recommended to name

Presents the act of naming as a formal recommendation.

it would be appropriate to name

Suggests naming based on suitability and relevance.

FAQs

How can I use "should be named" in a sentence?

Use "should be named" to suggest a suitable name or title for something. For example, "The new park "should be named Central Park" to reflect its location".

What are some alternatives to "should be named"?

Alternatives include "ought to be called", "could be designated", or "might be termed", depending on the context and level of formality.

Which is correct, "should be named" or "must be named"?

"Should be named" suggests a recommendation or suggestion, whereas "must be named" implies a requirement or obligation. The choice depends on whether you are advising or enforcing a naming convention.

When is it appropriate to use "should be named" in formal writing?

It is appropriate in formal writing to offer reasoned suggestions or recommendations for names, ensuring that the context supports the rationale behind the proposed name. Be clear, concise and provide proper reasoning as to why it "should be named" as such.