should be listed

USAGE SUMMARY

'should be listed' is correct and usable in written English and is usually used when making a suggestion or recommendation.
For example: All of the potential safety hazards should be listed in the organization's risk management plan.

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It should be listed under galleries, not shops.

The New York Times - Travel

Michael Scott Speicherer, should be listed as "missing/captured," rather than simply missing in action.

The New York Times

Examples of how the arts can help students to learn should be listed on the board.

The New York Times

· If your bike is worth more than £200 it should be listed as a "specified item".

The Guardian

First, it prevailed on the question of whether ammonia should be listed as an ingredient.

The New York Times

But otherwise any unspent funds should be listed as an asset.

The New York Times

Maybe that is what Ingram's position should be listed as: threat.

The New York Times

And friends and families should be listed by one another, if requested.

The New York Times

Once you have added your Apple ID information, both accounts should be listed on the screen.

The New York Times

Side effects and drug interactions should be listed.

Disease-a-Month

Of course, your papers and other publications should be listed.

Science Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be listed" in professional writing, ensure the context clearly explains why the item needs to be on the list. Provide explicit reasons or benefits for its inclusion.

Common error

Avoid using "should be listed" without specifying the criteria for inclusion. If the criteria are ambiguous, the list can become arbitrary and less useful. Clearly define the parameters for items that qualify for listing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be listed" functions as a recommendation or suggestion, often within instructions, guidelines, or procedures. It expresses an opinion or expectation that something ought to be included in a particular list. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Wiki

36%

News & Media

23%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should be listed" is a versatile phrase used to recommend or suggest inclusion in a list. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and applicability across diverse contexts, from informal wikis to formal news articles. Its frequency is very common, with prevalent use in "Wiki", "News & Media", and "Science". When using this phrase, ensure the criteria for listing are clear to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "ought to be included" or "must be recorded" can add formality or emphasis as needed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be included

Replaces "should" with a slightly more formal modal verb, implying a moral obligation or expectation.

needs to be included

Focuses on the necessity of the item's inclusion, emphasizing its importance.

must be recorded

Highlights the mandatory aspect of the listing, suggesting a strict requirement.

should be registered

Specifies a formal process of listing, typically with an official body or system.

is required to be listed

Emphasizes the legal or procedural necessity of the listing.

has to be listed

Indicates a strong obligation, similar to "must", but slightly less formal.

should appear

Focuses on the visibility of the item in a list, rather than the act of listing itself.

should feature

Implies that the item is a prominent or noteworthy part of the list.

it is advisable to list

Introduces an element of recommendation or suggestion, softening the directive.

it would be best to list

Suggests a course of action that is considered optimal or most beneficial.

FAQs

How do I use "should be listed" in a sentence?

Use "should be listed" to suggest or recommend that something be included in a list. For example, "All safety precautions "should be listed" in the manual."

What's a more formal way to say "should be listed"?

For a more formal tone, consider using "ought to be included" or "must be recorded". These alternatives convey a stronger sense of obligation or requirement compared to "should be listed".

Is "should be listed" grammatically correct?

Yes, "should be listed" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard structure of a modal verb ("should") combined with the passive voice ("be listed").

What's the difference between "should be listed" and "must be listed"?

"Should be listed" implies a recommendation or suggestion, while "must be listed" indicates a requirement or obligation. The latter is stronger and leaves less room for discretion.