should be led

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be led" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing guidance, leadership, or direction that is expected or required in a particular context. Example: "In times of crisis, the team should be led by someone with experience and strong decision-making skills."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Readers should be led into temptation.

The New Yorker

"Second, every classroom should be led by an excellent teacher.

The New York Times

Donbass should be led by a genuine Donetsk native".

The Guardian

Participants should be led to discover for themselves: do not force ideas.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

You should be cautious, he says, but you should be led by the science.

The Guardian

We believe that the recovery should be led by the private sector, Tony Blair does.

The Guardian

We should be led by the evidence of what works, not guesswork.

The Guardian - Opinion

Blair's office said he had argued that an independent inquiry should be "led by credible people".

The Guardian

"The military should be led by diplomacy," Admiral Mullen said during his trip.

The New York Times

Such discussions should be led by neutral third parties and include all Iraqi groups, including women.

The New York Times

Clegg said that the "Yes to fairer votes" campaign should be led by voters not politicians.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be led", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what is providing the leadership, and what the desired outcome is. This clarifies the purpose and direction of the leadership.

Common error

Avoid using "should be led" without specifying who or what is doing the leading. This can create confusion and weaken the clarity of your statement. Always clearly state the leader or guiding entity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be led" functions as a modal passive construction, indicating a recommendation or necessity for something to be guided or directed by someone or something else. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is considered correct and suitable for use in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

22%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should be led" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to convey the necessity or recommendation for something to be guided or directed. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is deemed correct for use in writing. It's crucial to specify who or what is providing the leadership to maintain clarity and avoid vagueness. The expression sees frequent usage across diverse contexts, particularly in news, scientific research and academic discourse. Remember to choose alternatives like ""ought to be guided"" or ""must be directed"" based on specific context to convey the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be guided

Indicates a moral or advisory obligation to be guided.

must be directed

Emphasizes a requirement or necessity for direction.

needs to be managed

Focuses on the necessity of managing or overseeing something.

has to be controlled

Highlights the need for control and regulation.

should be supervised

Implies oversight and monitoring are necessary.

needs to be stewarded

Focuses on careful and responsible management.

should be governed

Emphasizes the importance of governance and regulation.

ought to be overseen

Suggests a moral obligation for someone to supervise.

must be piloted

Emphasizes the need for someone to steer or guide.

needs to be coordinated

Highlights the need for effective coordination and organization.

FAQs

How can I use "should be led" in a sentence?

You can use "should be led" to express the idea that something needs guidance. For example, "The project "should be led" by an experienced manager" or "Discussions "should be led" by neutral third parties".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "should be led"?

Alternatives include "ought to be guided", "must be directed", or "needs to be managed" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "should be led by" or "should lead"?

"Should be led by" indicates a passive role, where something is being guided by someone else. "Should lead" indicates an active role, where something is taking the initiative to guide. The correct choice depends on the intended meaning.

What does it mean when something "should be led" by someone?

It implies that the subject requires guidance, direction, or management from a specific individual or entity to achieve a desired outcome or maintain control. It suggests that without proper leadership, the subject may not succeed or function correctly.