should be invalidated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be invalidated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something is deemed no longer valid or acceptable, often in legal, technical, or formal discussions. Example: "Due to the new evidence presented, the previous decision should be invalidated."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

The plaintiffs argued today that the results should be invalidated.

The New York Times

But on Monday, it expanded its attack to say the whole law should be invalidated.

The New York Times

Because their rights of due process were violated, they say, the subsequent rulings against them should be invalidated.

The New York Times - Sports

For the health of women and men everywhere, these patents, and the many other patents on human genes that have been issued, should be invalidated.

The New York Times

Patent specialists say the new rules will make it more likely that courts will wait until the patent office has finished studying whether a patent should be invalidated.

The New York Times

Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, thought that all recess appointments should be invalidated.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

Professor Coffee's response, available here, explains why such a bylaw may not be unreasonable and should only be invalidated in certain circumstances.

Columbia University

A bar on third party bonuses is not unreasonable (as CII has just agreed), and it should only be invalidated when its adoption was clearly intended to frustrate the shareholder's actual choice of directors.

Columbia University

Petitioners’ argument confuses the equal protection inquiry’s means and ends; §1409(a)(4) should not be invalidated because Congress elected to advance an interest that is less demanding to satisfy than some alternative.

Cornell University

(3) This health regulation should not be invalidated merely because the Court believes that alternative milk inspection methods might insure the cleanliness and healthfulness of Dean's Illinois milk.

Cornell University

Even if there were partisan motivations, the judge said, the Supreme Court's decision in the Indiana case held that a nondiscriminatory law should not be invalidated simply because some legislators had partisan motivations.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be invalidated", ensure the context clearly indicates the basis for the invalidation, such as new evidence, legal precedent, or procedural errors. This provides clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

While "should be invalidated" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing seem weak or indirect. Consider rephrasing to use active voice where appropriate, such as "the court should invalidate the law" for a more direct statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be invalidated" functions as a verb phrase in the passive voice, expressing that an action (invalidation) ought to be performed on a subject. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is suitable for expressing that something ought to be deemed no longer valid or acceptable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

18%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should be invalidated" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to convey that something lacks validity and ought to be formally overturned or nullified. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is acceptable in written English and suitable for formal discussions. It appears most frequently in news and media, academic, and scientific contexts, reflecting its use in objective and analytical discourse. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in the reasons for invalidation to strengthen your argument. Alternatives such as "ought to be nullified" or "must be revoked" can provide nuanced variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be nullified

Replaces "should" with "ought to" and "invalidated" with "nullified", implying a moral obligation to invalidate.

must be revoked

Conveys a stronger sense of necessity than "should", using "must" instead, and replaces "invalidated" with "revoked".

needs to be overturned

Uses "needs to be" instead of "should be" and replaces "invalidated" with "overturned", often used in legal contexts.

should be deemed void

Replaces "invalidated" with "deemed void", emphasizing the legal status of being without effect.

should be rendered ineffective

Uses "rendered ineffective" instead of "invalidated", focusing on the practical outcome of losing effect.

should be rescinded

Replaces "invalidated" with "rescinded", indicating a formal withdrawal or cancellation.

ought to be reversed

Similar to 'ought to be nullified', but uses 'reversed', implying a previous valid state.

must be repealed

Uses “repealed” which is related to the cancellation of a law.

should be quashed

Replaces "invalidated" with "quashed", indicating that something is put to an end.

should be voided

Uses a simpler form of “deemed void”.

FAQs

How to use "should be invalidated" in a sentence?

Use "should be invalidated" when you want to express that something lacks legal or factual basis and ought to be declared void. For example, "The contract "should be invalidated" due to fraudulent activity."

What can I say instead of "should be invalidated"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be nullified", "must be revoked", or "needs to be overturned" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "should be invalidated" or "should invalidate"?

"Should be invalidated" is used in the passive voice, indicating something is acted upon. "Should invalidate" is active, meaning something is performing the action. For example, "the law "should be invalidated"" versus "the court should invalidate the law".

What's the difference between "should be invalidated" and "could be invalidated"?

"Should be invalidated" suggests a higher degree of certainty or justification for invalidation. "Could be invalidated" indicates a possibility but not necessarily a strong likelihood or reason. The first express a stronger need than the second.