Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
should be interesting
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "should be interesting" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when expressing an expectation or prediction about something being engaging or captivating. Example: "The lecture on quantum physics should be interesting, given the speaker's expertise."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
should be exciting
should be advantageous
should be useful
should be enjoyable
should be incompatible
should be immediate
should be flexible
will be informative
will be valuable
will be advantageous
will be amusing
will be useful
will be exciting
will be rewarding
will be interested
will be worthwhile
will be worth
merits attention
will be intriguing
will be pleasurable
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Should be interesting.
News & Media
This should be interesting.
News & Media
It should be interesting".
News & Media
This conference should be interesting.
News & Media
Should be interesting.
News & Media
Life should be interesting".
News & Media
Tomorrow's quiz should be interesting.
News & Media
Their return should be interesting.
News & Media
The results should be interesting.
News & Media
Still, it should be interesting.
News & Media
But the racing should be interesting.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "should be interesting" to express a neutral expectation of something being engaging, often based on prior knowledge or context. It's suitable for a wide range of situations, from casual conversations to formal writing.
Common error
Avoid using "should be interesting" as a filler phrase without providing context. Instead, specify why something is likely to be interesting to enhance the impact of your statement. For example, instead of saying "The conference should be interesting", specify "The conference should be interesting, given the lineup of expert speakers."
Source & Trust
90%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "should be interesting" functions as a predictive expression, indicating an expectation or anticipation that something will be engaging or captivating. As supported by Ludwig, it is a correct and usable phrase. It sets a tone of mild anticipation or curiosity.
Frequent in
News & Media
88%
Academia
5%
Science
4%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "should be interesting" is a versatile phrase used to express an expectation that something will be engaging or noteworthy. Ludwig confirms that it is grammatically correct and widely used. Its neutral tone makes it suitable for various contexts, particularly in News & Media, as well as Academia and Science. While it is a common expression, writers are advised to provide context to enhance its impact. Alternatives such as "is likely to be intriguing" or "promises to be engaging" can add nuance. Therefore, while "should be interesting" is perfectly acceptable, being mindful of context and exploring alternative expressions will improve writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
ought to be fascinating
Replaces "should" with "ought to", implying a moral or logical expectation of being interesting, shifting the emphasis slightly.
promises to be engaging
Focuses on the potential of something to capture attention and hold interest, rather than a simple expectation.
is likely to be intriguing
Emphasizes the probability of piquing curiosity and holding fascination.
has the potential to captivate
Highlights the inherent ability of something to charm and enthrall.
could prove to be stimulating
Suggests that something might offer intellectual or creative invigoration.
may well be compelling
Indicates a strong possibility of something attracting strong interest and attention.
figures to be absorbing
Uses a more informal tone to suggest something will be deeply engaging.
shapes up to be remarkable
Expresses that something shows signs of being exceptionally noteworthy or impressive.
is anticipated to be riveting
Highlights expectation of something being intensely captivating or exciting.
is expected to be enriching
Focuses on the potential for something to provide valuable or meaningful insights.
FAQs
How can I use "should be interesting" in a sentence?
Use "should be interesting" to express your expectation that something will be engaging or captivating. For example, "The debate on climate change "should be interesting", considering the differing viewpoints of the panelists".
What are some alternatives to "should be interesting"?
You can use alternatives like "is likely to be intriguing", "promises to be engaging", or "ought to be fascinating" depending on the nuance you want to convey.
Is "should be interesting" formal or informal?
"Should be interesting" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, for highly formal writing, consider more sophisticated alternatives.
What does it imply when someone says "This should be interesting"?
It usually implies that the speaker anticipates the situation or event will be engaging or noteworthy, though it can sometimes be used sarcastically to suggest the opposite.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
90%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested