should be identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something needs to be recognized or specified in a particular context. Example: "All potential risks should be identified before proceeding with the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Leaders of the assault should be identified and prosecuted.

The New York Times

The jobs should be identified, their characteristics should be stated..

Cornell University

Therefore, new materials should be identified to solve this problem.

Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids

First, the overall effect on endothelium should be identified.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Less significant changes should be identified by a "minor" version.

SOA and Web Services Interface Design Principles, Techniques, and Standards

The people who are responsible for the Abu Ghraib abuses should be identified and punished.

The New York Times

That seems unlikely, but if it is so, the problems should be identified.

The New York Times

The argument over how Bikowsky should be identified in the report was particularly freighted.

The New Yorker

Many investors believe good operators should be identified, appointed sparingly and paid better.

The Guardian - Business

The child's feelings should be identified and processed -- "You seem very angry today.

The New York Times - Health

Offenders with mental health issues should be identified as early as possible.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Combine "should be identified" with a clear indication of who is responsible for the identification process. This ensures accountability and facilitates effective action.

Common error

Avoid overusing passive constructions like "should be identified" in your writing. While appropriate in certain contexts, excessive use can make your writing sound weak and indirect. Opt for active voice where possible to enhance clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be identified" functions as a verb phrase in the passive voice, expressing a recommendation or requirement for something to be recognized or determined. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable nature.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

35%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be identified" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction, mainly in science, news, and academic writing. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is used to express the necessity of recognizing or specifying something. While appropriate, it's important to be mindful of overusing passive voice and to ensure clarity in the criteria for identification. Related phrases offer alternative ways to express similar ideas, and understanding the contexts and nuances of each can enhance writing precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

needs to be recognized

Focuses on the necessity of acknowledging something.

must be ascertained

Emphasizes the importance of confirming something definitively.

ought to be determined

Suggests a moral obligation to find something out.

requires detection

Highlights the need for discovering something, especially something hidden.

demands recognition

Stresses the urgency of acknowledging something.

warrants specification

Indicates that something needs to be clearly defined.

calls for discovery

Emphasizes the need to uncover or find something new.

is essential to pinpoint

Highlights the importance of precisely locating something.

needs to be pinpointed

Focuses on precisely locating something.

has to be detected

Highlights that something needs to be found out.

FAQs

How can I use "should be identified" in a sentence?

The phrase "should be identified" is used to express the necessity of recognizing or specifying something. For example, "Potential risks "should be identified" before starting a project."

What are some alternatives to "should be identified"?

Alternatives include phrases like "needs to be recognized", "must be ascertained", or "ought to be determined", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "should be identified"?

While "should be identified" is in the passive voice, it is grammatically correct. However, consider using the active voice if it makes your writing clearer and more direct, such as "the team should identify the risks".

What is the difference between "should be identified" and "must be identified"?

"Should be identified" suggests a recommendation or advisability, while "must be identified" implies a stronger obligation or requirement. The choice depends on the level of necessity you want to express.