should be focused on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be focused on" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase in any situation in which you need to express the idea that someone should pay attention to an idea, task, or object. For example, "The importance of customer satisfaction should be focused on in this company so that we can retain our customers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

What responsibilities should be focused on, and which ones have been kept off the table?

The Guardian

The paper should be focused on that.

The Guardian

Instead, Washington should be focused on fundamental policy choices.

The New York Times

This should be focused on those most in need.

The Guardian

Therefore, the biomechanical test should be focused on the metaphysis.

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

"The district attorney should be focused on enforcing laws first.

The New York Times

"To me, that's what we should be focused on.

The New York Times

It's a market we should be focused on expanding.

The New York Times

That's what Congress should be focused on as well.

The New York Times

It should be focused on teamwork and customer success.

Harvard Business Review

Indeed, the country should be focused on the opioid crisis.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be focused on", ensure that the subject receiving the focus is clearly defined. Avoid ambiguity by specifying who or what should be prioritizing the action.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive voice with "should be focused on". Active voice often makes sentences more direct and impactful. For example, instead of "Customer satisfaction should be focused on by the team", try "The team should focus on customer satisfaction".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be focused on" functions as a modal passive construction, indicating an action that ought to receive particular attention or emphasis. According to Ludwig, it correctly expresses the need for prioritization.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

42%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should be focused on" is a versatile and grammatically correct expression used to recommend or emphasize specific areas for attention. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, particularly news, scientific, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, ensure the subject is clearly defined, and consider using the active voice for more direct communication. While "should be focused on" is very common, consider semantically similar alternatives provided, such as "should prioritize" or "ought to concentrate on", to add variety to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

should direct attention to

Highlights the act of guiding or channeling attention toward a specific target.

should prioritize

This alternative replaces "focused on" with a verb that directly implies importance and order of precedence.

should give precedence to

Emphasizes the act of prioritizing something over other things.

should zero in on

Suggests a precise and concentrated focus, like adjusting the lens of a camera.

ought to concentrate on

Replaces "should be focused on" with a more active voice and emphasizes concentration or dedicated effort.

should be geared towards

This alternative conveys the idea of being designed or adapted for a specific purpose or outcome.

should center on

Suggests making something the central point or core of attention.

needs to emphasize

Shifts the focus to highlighting or giving prominence to something.

should target

Implies aiming efforts or resources at a specific goal or objective.

must address

Implies a necessity to deal with or pay attention to a particular issue or concern.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "should be focused on" to sound more active?

You can use active alternatives such as "should prioritize", "should emphasize", or "should concentrate on" to make your writing more direct.

Is it better to use "should focus on" or "should be focused on"?

"Should focus on" is in the active voice and often more concise. "Should be focused on" is passive and can be useful when you want to emphasize the object receiving the action rather than the actor, but it can sometimes sound less direct. Use "should focus on" when the actor matters, and "should be focused on" when the object is more important.

What does "should be focused on" mean?

The phrase "should be focused on" indicates that something deserves particular attention or emphasis. It implies that resources, efforts, or thoughts ought to be directed toward a specific area or subject.

Can I use "must be focused on" instead of "should be focused on"?

While you can use "must be focused on", it conveys a stronger sense of obligation or necessity than "should be focused on". "Must" implies a requirement, while "should" suggests a recommendation.