should be exposed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'should be exposed' is correct and usable in written English.
It typically means to make something public, typically something that has been hidden or kept secret. For example, "The truth about the company's illegal activities should be exposed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They should be exposed to that.

The Guardian - Sport

He should be exposed and fired.

The New York Times

Its failings should be exposed in detailed published critiques.

The Guardian

"I thought that she should be exposed to that".

The New York Times

Obviously, I think white supremacists should be exposed as idiots.

The Guardian - Opinion

Public figures should be exposed if they behave badly.

Independent

Our youngest children really should be exposed to and taught foreign languages.

The New York Times

"I'm not sure they should be exposed to this," he said.

The New York Times

"It is right that wrongdoing and deceit should be exposed," he writes.

The Guardian

It raises obvious questions about how – and if – vulnerable children should be exposed on television.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

And how do they decide whether we should be exposed to a "novel food" at all?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should be exposed" when advocating for the revelation of information that is hidden or suppressed. Consider the ethical implications of exposing sensitive information.

Common error

Avoid using "should be exposed" in contexts where it might contribute to unnecessary sensationalism or invasion of privacy. Ensure the potential benefits of revealing information outweigh the potential harm.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be exposed" functions as a modal passive construction. It expresses a recommendation or obligation that something (an entity, information, or practice) undergo the action of being revealed or uncovered. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be exposed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that advocates for the revelation of hidden or suppressed information. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears across a wide range of contexts, particularly in news, media, and scientific discussions. When using this phrase, it's crucial to consider the ethical implications and ensure that the potential benefits of exposing information outweigh the potential harm. Alternatives like "ought to be revealed" or "needs to be uncovered" can provide subtle shifts in emphasis, while still conveying the core message of revealing something that is not currently known.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be revealed

Replaces "should" with "ought to", maintaining the sense of obligation while "revealed" specifies the act of uncovering.

needs to be uncovered

"Needs to" indicates necessity and "uncovered" suggests removing a covering to reveal something.

must be disclosed

"Must" implies a stronger obligation, and "disclosed" suggests making information officially available.

should be unveiled

"Unveiled" provides a more dramatic sense of revelation than "exposed".

should be introduced

Shifts the meaning towards introducing someone or something to a new experience or environment.

should be familiarized with

Focuses on the process of becoming acquainted with something.

should be acquainted with

Similar to "familiarized with", this emphasizes the act of getting to know something.

should experience

Suggests the importance of having a particular experience.

deserves to be showcased

Implies that something is worthy of being displayed or highlighted.

warrants examination

Indicates that something is worthy of investigation or scrutiny.

FAQs

How can I use "should be exposed" in a sentence?

Use "should be exposed" to argue that something hidden or secret needs to be revealed. For example, "The company's fraudulent activities "should be exposed" to the public."

What are some alternatives to "should be exposed"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "ought to be revealed", "must be disclosed", or "needs to be uncovered".

Is it always appropriate to say something "should be exposed"?

No, consider the ethical implications and potential harm. It's important to weigh the benefits of revealing information against the potential negative consequences for those involved. In some cases, privacy and confidentiality may be more important.

What's the difference between "should be exposed" and "should be introduced"?

"Should be exposed" implies revealing something hidden, while "should be introduced" suggests making someone or something known for the first time. The former is about unveiling, while the latter is about initiating acquaintance.