should be corrected

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'should be corrected' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are talking about making a correction to something, either literally or figuratively. For example, "The Wikipedia page about the history of Africa should be corrected to better reflect its complexity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

This should be corrected".

The New York Times

These deficiencies should be corrected.

The New York Times

But it should be corrected.

The New York Times

Writer feels this situation should be corrected.

The New Yorker

I think the statement should be corrected".

The Guardian

Serious problem that should be corrected".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

In general, a non-linear behaviour should be corrected for.

Cancer Nanotechnology

'Figure 1' should be corrected to 'Fig. 2'.

Financial Innovation

The word 'with' should be corrected to 'without'without

Financial Innovation

The authors' claim should be corrected accordingly.

eLife

agassizensis..". should be corrected to "Ssp.

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be corrected", ensure the context clearly identifies what needs correction and why. This enhances clarity and prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "should be corrected" without specifying what the error is or how it can be rectified. Provide context or details to make the statement actionable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be corrected" functions as a modal passive construction, indicating that an action (correction) is advisable or necessary. Ludwig AI's assessment confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

20%

News & Media

20%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

15%

Wiki

15%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be corrected" is a grammatically correct and widely used expression that suggests the need for rectification or improvement. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, indicating its common usage across diverse contexts such as news, science, and academia. While versatile, clarity and specificity are key when employing this phrase to ensure effective communication. Related alternatives such as "needs to be rectified" or "requires revision" can offer nuanced options depending on the context. The expression is a frequent one, demonstrating its utility in identifying and addressing errors or inaccuracies. Be clear about what needs correction and why to maximize the impact of the statement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

needs to be rectified

Emphasizes the necessity of fixing something that is wrong or unjust.

must be amended

Suggests a formal change or addition to improve accuracy or fairness.

requires revision

Highlights the need for a renewed look and modification.

ought to be adjusted

Implies a slight change or alteration for better alignment or performance.

has to be fixed

Indicates an obligation to repair or resolve an issue.

warrants improvement

Suggests that there is room for enhancement or refinement.

is in need of modification

Stresses that something requires changes to its form or content.

calls for rectification

A more formal way of saying something needs to be corrected.

could be improved

Indicates potential for enhancement without necessarily implying a flaw.

demands an overhaul

Suggests that extensive changes are necessary.

FAQs

How can I use "should be corrected" in a sentence?

You can use "should be corrected" to indicate that something is inaccurate or flawed and needs to be fixed. For example, "This historical error "should be corrected" by all means."

What's a more formal alternative to "should be corrected"?

More formal alternatives include "must be amended", "requires revision", or "ought to be adjusted". These options are suitable for professional or academic contexts.

Is "should be corrected" always the best choice, or are there better alternatives?

While "should be corrected" is generally acceptable, alternatives like "needs to be rectified" or "requires revision" might be more appropriate depending on the context and desired level of formality.

What's the difference between "should be corrected" and "should be revised"?

"Should be corrected" often implies a factual error, while "should be revised" suggests that improvements are needed in terms of clarity, organization, or style.