should be considered jointly

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be considered jointly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing items, factors, or elements that need to be evaluated together rather than separately. Example: "The financial and environmental impacts of the project should be considered jointly to ensure a balanced decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

Socio-economic and ecological objectives should be considered jointly in considering livestock production.

Livestock Production Science

We also find evidence that project contributions and social factors interact in predicting authorship, suggesting that the two sets of factors should be considered jointly rather than seen as independent determinants of attribution.

Research Policy

If Strickland and Brady errors should be considered jointly when assessing prejudice, then why shouldn't the impact of all errors that potentially affective the reliability of a verdict be taken into account?

Cornell University

Accordingly, our findings suggest that the presence of design rules and the extent of partner coupling should be considered jointly when optimizing network configurations that focus on architectural innovation.

Research Policy

With this legacy, the court concluded that the entire property should be considered jointly held by Muslims and Hindus and distributed under relevant Indian property statutes, Mr. Salve said, which divide contested properties on the principle of fairness.

The New York Times

This work demonstrates that various manufacturing parameters should be considered jointly when designing or redesigning a facility because setting different levels for parameters can considerably affect the performance of a facility.

Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

When analysing fairness, the fairness definition (12) should therefore be considered jointly with user throughput results.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

An urban drainage system must be considered jointly, i.e., by means of an integrated approach.

Water Research

Both variables can also be considered jointly.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

If the interaction is present, the interacting factors must be considered jointly.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

That is why inconsistency and heterogeneity must be considered jointly.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be considered jointly", ensure that the rationale for considering the elements together is clear to the reader. Provide context explaining why individual assessment is insufficient.

Common error

A common mistake is to state that items "should be considered jointly" without explaining why they are interdependent or how they influence each other. Always clarify the relationship between the elements being jointly considered.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be considered jointly" functions as a recommendation or suggestion to evaluate multiple elements together. Ludwig AI shows the phrase appearing in contexts where a comprehensive or integrated understanding is crucial, often highlighting the limitations of separate analysis.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

13%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should be considered jointly" is a recommendation for a holistic approach to assessment. Ludwig AI indicates its grammatical correctness and suitability for suggesting that multiple elements must be evaluated together to gain a sound understanding. Primarily found in scientific and academic contexts, it emphasizes interconnectedness and the inadequacy of isolated analysis. Alternatives include "should be evaluated in conjunction" and "must be assessed together". When using the phrase, clarify the rationale for considering elements together to prevent ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

should be evaluated in conjunction

Replaces "considered jointly" with "evaluated in conjunction", emphasizing formal assessment.

must be assessed together

Uses "must" to indicate necessity and "assessed" for a more formal evaluation.

ought to be viewed collectively

Substitutes "should" with "ought to" and "considered" with "viewed", adding formality.

require simultaneous consideration

Highlights the need for simultaneous evaluation of multiple items.

need to be examined as a whole

Emphasizes holistic assessment rather than separate analysis.

must be analyzed in unison

Uses "analyzed" and "in unison" to convey simultaneous and coordinated evaluation.

should be understood comprehensively

Focuses on achieving a complete and integrated understanding.

should be factored in together

Highlights the act of including elements in an overall calculation or assessment.

must be taken into account collectively

Stresses the importance of considering factors as a unified group.

warrant a unified approach to evaluation

Shifts the focus to needing a single, coordinated method for assessment.

FAQs

How can I use "should be considered jointly" in a sentence?

Use "should be considered jointly" to suggest that two or more factors, ideas, or pieces of information must be evaluated together to reach a sound judgment. For example, "The financial and environmental impacts of the policy "should be considered jointly" to ensure a balanced decision".

What does "should be considered jointly" mean?

The phrase "should be considered jointly" means that multiple elements or factors should be evaluated together, rather than separately, because they are interconnected and influence each other.

What can I say instead of "should be considered jointly"?

You can use alternatives such as "should be evaluated in conjunction", "must be assessed together", or "ought to be viewed collectively" depending on the specific context.

Why is it important to consider factors jointly?

Considering factors jointly allows for a more holistic and accurate understanding of a situation, as it takes into account the interdependencies and interactions between different elements. Failing to do so can lead to incomplete or biased conclusions.