should be appointed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be appointed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the necessity or recommendation for someone to be designated for a position or role. Example: "The committee believes that a new leader should be appointed to guide the project moving forward."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A prosecutor should be appointed to help them.

The Guardian

Members should be appointed by parliament and not the whips.

The Guardian - Opinion

The Review proposed that planning champions should be appointed across the country to oppose unpopular developments.

Independent

Second, a special representative on climate and security should be appointed.

The New York Times

An independent commission should be appointed to monitor all Fifa elections.

The Guardian - Opinion

The commission also argued that press officers should be appointed by merit rather than ministerial preference.

The Guardian

Scalia's remarks imply that an evangelical Christian should be appointed to the Court.

The New Yorker

— Arne Duncan, on Friedman's opinion that he should be appointed Secretary of State.

The New Yorker

A special independent counsel should be appointed immediately to carry out a full and public investigation.

The New York Times

The regulator had questioned whether Diamond should be appointed to the role, Tyrie said.

The Guardian - Business

His report suggested that non-executives should be appointed for specific terms with reappointment not automatic.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use “should be appointed” to express a recommendation or suggestion, not a statement of fact. It implies that the appointment is desirable but not yet confirmed.

Common error

Avoid using "should be appointed" without specifying the appointing authority or the criteria for selection. This can lead to confusion and weaken the impact of your recommendation. Be specific about who 'should' do the appointing and why.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be appointed" primarily functions as a verb phrase expressing a recommendation, suggestion, or advisability regarding the designation of an individual to a specific role. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a common way to suggest a course of action.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

89%

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Science

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should be appointed" is a versatile phrase used to recommend the selection of an individual for a specific role. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for a wide range of contexts. It's particularly prevalent in news and media, where it's used to discuss potential appointments in politics, business, and other fields. When using this phrase, clarity is key: specify the appointing authority and the criteria for selection to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "ought to be designated" or "needs to be nominated" to fine-tune the level of formality and emphasis. Ludwig's analysis shows that the phrase is frequently found in reputable sources like The Guardian and The New York Times, reinforcing its credibility and widespread use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be designated

Replaces "should" with "ought to", indicating a moral obligation or advisability for the appointment.

needs to be nominated

Focuses on the necessity of the nomination process before the appointment can occur.

must be selected

Emphasizes the imperative nature of the selection process.

has to be chosen

Similar to "must be selected", but uses more informal language.

is required to be instated

Highlights the formal requirement for the appointment to take place.

is recommended for selection

Indicates a positive endorsement or suggestion for the individual's appointment.

is advised to be named

Suggests that appointing someone is a good idea or beneficial course of action.

is slated for assignment

Implies that the appointment is already planned or scheduled.

is deemed fit to be installed

Emphasizes the suitability and qualification of the individual for the position.

is proposed for designation

Highlights that this is only a proposal at this time.

FAQs

How can I use "should be appointed" in a sentence?

The phrase "should be appointed" is used to express a recommendation or suggestion that someone be designated for a particular role or position. For example, "A special prosecutor "should be appointed" to investigate the matter" indicates a recommendation for appointing a prosecutor.

What's the difference between "should be appointed" and "must be appointed"?

"Should be appointed" implies a recommendation or suggestion, while "must be appointed" indicates a requirement or necessity. "Must be appointed" conveys a stronger sense of obligation or urgency.

What can I say instead of "should be appointed"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be designated", "needs to be nominated", or "has to be chosen depending on the context and the level of formality you want to convey.

Is "should be appointed" formal or informal?

The phrase "should be appointed" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts, although it's more common in professional or news-related communications than in casual conversation.