should be a priority

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of a sentence "should be a priority" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you want to emphasize the importance of something. For example, "Taking care of the environment should be a priority for everyone."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

That should be a priority.

The New York Times

This should be a priority.

The New York Times

Yet maybe that should be a priority.

The Economist

But education should be a priority.

The Guardian

That should be a priority for India.

The Guardian

"To me, that should be a priority.

The New York Times

Strengthening tax-revenue authorities should be a priority for aid.

The Guardian

"Course and hall events should be a priority.

The Guardian

Accelerating those agreements, and increasing aid, should be a priority.

The Guardian - Opinion

Ms. Martin agreed that that should be a priority.

The New York Times

Increasing teachers' salaries should be a priority for Uganda.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be a priority", clearly state why something warrants prioritization to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid stating that everything "should be a priority". Prioritization implies making choices; overuse dilutes the meaning and effectiveness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be a priority" functions as a recommendation or assertion of importance. It suggests that a particular action or item warrants immediate attention and resources. Ludwig AI confirms this usage across numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should be a priority" is a common and grammatically correct way to express the importance of something. Ludwig AI validates this with numerous examples from reputable sources like The New York Times, The Guardian and the Independent. It's used to advocate for the prioritization of actions, issues, or goals, with the intention of influencing decisions. While versatile, it's crucial to use the phrase judiciously and provide clear reasons for the suggested prioritization to avoid diluting its impact. Alternatives like "ought to be prioritized" or "needs to be a focus" can add variety while maintaining a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be prioritized

Replaces "should" with "ought to" and uses the verb "prioritized" for a slightly more formal tone.

is of utmost importance

Uses a more emphatic expression to indicate the highest level of significance.

needs to be a focus

Shifts from "priority" to "focus", emphasizing concentration of effort.

is paramount

Uses a single word to convey the idea of being supreme or dominant in importance.

is essential

Replaces the entire phrase with a single, strong adjective.

must be given precedence

Emphasizes the act of giving priority, suggesting a formal decision.

requires immediate action

Focuses on the necessity of taking action without delay.

demands immediate attention

Highlights urgency and the need for swift action.

warrants special consideration

Suggests a careful and thoughtful approach to prioritizing.

deserves top billing

An idiomatic expression suggesting that something should be at the top of a list or agenda.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "should be a priority" in a sentence?

To use "should be a priority" effectively, clearly state what action or item needs prioritization and provide a reason for its importance. For example, "Investing in renewable energy "should be a priority" because it ensures a sustainable future".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "should be a priority"?

You can use alternatives such as "ought to be prioritized", "needs to be a focus", or "must be given precedence" depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

When is it appropriate to use "should be a priority" in writing?

It's appropriate to use "should be a priority" when you want to emphasize the importance of something and suggest that it needs immediate attention or resources. It's suitable for both formal and informal contexts, but be mindful of the tone.

How does "should be a priority" differ from "could be a priority"?

"Should be a priority" implies a stronger sense of obligation or necessity compared to "could be a priority". The former suggests something is essential, while the latter indicates a possibility or suggestion.