Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

should account for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should account for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something should be taken into consideration or explained. Example: All expenses should account for in your budget.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Our literature should account for this.

That probably should account for a few people.

Risk assessment should account for gender and life cycle differences.

Tourism should account for 16% of the final total.

News & Media

The Economist

"There is some argument about whether we should account for those emissions, but we do".

They should account for trash the same way they account for money".

News & Media

The New York Times

NGOs should account for the money they spend as contracted agents of donors.

News & Media

The Guardian

"Heritage should account for something," said James J. Rhoades, a Republican state senator from Schuylkill County.

News & Media

The New York Times

Straightforward information should account for a very small part of newspapers, Kelner said.

News & Media

The Guardian

Accurate estimation of fragmentation effects should account for additive edge effects and edge age.

Future studies should account for the horizontal bias in their designs and analyses.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should account for", ensure that the context clearly indicates what factors or elements need to be considered or included. For instance, "The budget should account for potential unexpected expenses."

Common error

Avoid vagueness by specifying what "should account for". Instead of saying "The plan should account for everything", be specific: "The plan should account for resource allocation, timelines, and potential risks".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should account for" functions as a modal verb phrase indicating obligation or necessity in considering or including something. It suggests that a particular factor, element, or aspect needs to be taken into consideration. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

37%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "should account for" is a versatile expression indicating the necessity of considering or including something in a plan, calculation, or explanation. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and common usage across diverse fields. It is prevalent in scientific, news, and business contexts, suggesting a formal to neutral register. Related phrases include "ought to consider" and "should take into account". A key writing tip is to specify what needs to be accounted for to avoid vagueness. With 61 examples and authoritative sources like The New York Times and Forbes, "should account for" is a well-established and useful phrase in English writing.

FAQs

How to use "should account for" in a sentence?

Use "should account for" to indicate that something needs to be considered or included in a calculation or plan. For example, "The risk assessment "should account for" all potential hazards".

What can I say instead of "should account for"?

You can use alternatives like "should consider", "must take into consideration", or "should take into account" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "should account for" or "should take into account"?

Both ""should account for"" and "should take into account" are correct and largely interchangeable. The choice often depends on personal preference or the specific nuance you want to convey.

What's the difference between "should account for" and "should allow for"?

"Should account for" generally means to include or explain something, while "should allow for" implies making provisions or adjustments for something. For example, a budget ""should account for"" all expenses, while it "should allow for" unexpected costs.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: