short on analysis

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "short on analysis" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where there is a lack of thorough examination or evaluation of a subject or issue. Example: "The report was informative, but it was short on analysis, leaving many questions unanswered."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

It's also short on analysis.

The New York Times - Books

Long on words, short on analysis.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Although the book is short on analysis, it is crammed with diverting anecdotal material..

The New Yorker

However, most of these bodies of thought emphasize advocacy and are short on analysis.

University of California, Berkeley

MacDougall's account is objective enough but short on analysis, and relies too much on quotations from other writers.

The Guardian - Books

Coverage was heavy on government and world affairs, but short on analysis; the writing was ponderous, with long sentences and dangling phrases.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

The exhibition comes with a beautiful hardcover catalog, which is long on glossy images and short on scholarly analysis.

The New York Times

Accordingly, many women's Web sites are short on news analysis and are instead crammed full of advice.

The New York Times - Tech

In response, Microsoft said, "The government filing is long on rhetoric but short on economic analysis or factual support for its overreaching proposals".

The New York Times

Long on titillation and superfluous storytelling and short on keen analysis, these books fail as even a first draft of history.

The New York Times - Books

The memoirs were a hit — and they are not really as short on character analysis and motive as their clipped, taciturn sentences would suggest.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "short on analysis", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific aspects lack sufficient examination. Be precise about the areas needing more analytical depth.

Common error

Avoid using "short on analysis" as a vague criticism. Instead, pinpoint the exact analytical gaps, like lacking statistical support or overlooking key variables. Always provide context to enhance the critique's clarity and effectiveness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "short on analysis" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun (often implicit) to describe its deficiency in analytical depth. It indicates that something, like a report or argument, lacks thorough examination. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

29%

Science

21%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "short on analysis" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to express a deficiency in analytical depth. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is correct and usable in written English. Predominantly found in news, academic, and scientific contexts, it serves as a neutral to professional critique. While versatile, it is best used with specific context, highlighting the exact areas lacking scrutiny. Alternatives such as "lacking in analysis" or "deficient in analysis" can be used depending on the intended nuance. By avoiding overgeneralizations and pinpointing analytical gaps, writers can employ "short on analysis" effectively. This expression has a common frequency.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking in analysis

This alternative directly replaces "short on" with "lacking in", maintaining a similar structure and meaning.

deficient in analysis

Replaces "short on" with "deficient in", suggesting a more significant lack of analysis.

lacking analytical depth

Focuses on the depth of analysis that is missing, rather than just the presence of analysis.

superficial analysis

Indicates that the analysis exists but is not thorough or insightful.

cursory analysis

Suggests a hasty and brief analysis, lacking detail.

limited analysis

Emphasizes the restricted amount or scope of the analysis performed.

insufficient analysis

Highlights that the analysis provided is not adequate or enough.

wanting in rigorous analysis

Indicates a lack of strictness and thoroughness in the analytical process.

analytically underdeveloped

Describes something as not having been analyzed sufficiently.

light on the details of the analysis

Highlights the lack of specific information and deep details within the analysis.

FAQs

How can I use "short on analysis" in a sentence?

You can use "short on analysis" to describe a situation where something lacks a thorough examination. For example, "The report was informative but "short on analysis", leaving many questions unanswered."

What's a good substitute for "short on analysis"?

Alternatives include "lacking in analysis", "deficient in analysis", or "superficial analysis depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey".

Is it better to say 'lacking analysis' or "short on analysis"?

Both "short on analysis" and "lacking analysis" are acceptable. "Short on analysis" is slightly more informal. The best choice depends on the context and desired tone.

What does it mean when something is described as "short on analysis"?

It means that while the subject might have other qualities, it doesn't provide a deep or thorough examination of the relevant issues. More analysis is needed to provide insights and understanding.