Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

she was trained

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of a sentence "she was trained" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when referring to a person having received a certain kind of training. For example: "She was trained in first aid, so she is qualified to help in an emergency."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

She was trained in CPR.

News & Media

The New Yorker

She was trained, she said.

News & Media

The New York Times

She was trained by Peter Walwyn.

News & Media

The New York Times

Before getting her PhD in history, she was trained in computational condensed matter physics.

She was trained as an Agricultural and Environmental Engineer from McGill University, Canada.

She was trained to knock on our roommate's door if she needed anything.

She was trained in the ritual part by a Conservative rabbi.

News & Media

The New York Times

She was trained with 50 other girls, most of them orphans like her.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

With the help of a UNICEF-supported programme she was trained in hairdressing and cosmetology, and how to run a small business.

Formal & Business

Unicef

Use your vet, he/she was trained for this they know what to do and pick a vet you trust.

For both jobs, she said she was trained only by other interns.

News & Media

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Specify the area of training to provide context. For example, use "she was trained in CPR" rather than just "she was trained".

Common error

Avoid using "she was trained" without specifying the field or skill. It lacks context and reduces clarity. Instead of saying "she was trained", specify what she was trained in, such as "she was trained as a nurse."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "she was trained" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject ('she') received training, rather than actively performing the training. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used. It serves to describe a past event where skills or knowledge were imparted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Academia

19%

Science

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "she was trained" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that a person has received specific training or instruction. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and frequently used across various contexts. It’s most common in news and media, academia, and scientific publications. For clarity, specify the training area. Related alternatives include "she received training" and "she underwent training". While generally neutral, the level of formality can adjust based on context. Using the phrase effectively involves specifying the type of training received to avoid overgeneralization.

FAQs

How to use "she was trained" in a sentence?

Use "she was trained" to indicate that someone received instruction or education in a particular skill or field. For example, "She was trained as an engineer" or "She was trained in martial arts".

What can I say instead of "she was trained"?

You can use alternatives like "she received training", "she underwent training", or "she was educated" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "she was trained at" or "she was trained in"?

Both are correct, but "she was trained in" is typically used to specify the subject or skill (e.g., "she was trained in first aid"), while "she was trained at" is used to specify the institution or place (e.g., "she was trained at Harvard").

What is the difference between "she was trained" and "she is trained"?

"She was trained" indicates that the training happened in the past, whereas "she is trained" implies that she currently possesses the training or the state of being trained is ongoing or relevant.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: