Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
she was trained
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The part of a sentence "she was trained" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when referring to a person having received a certain kind of training. For example: "She was trained in first aid, so she is qualified to help in an emergency."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
she received training
she underwent training
she was educated
she was trained in
she was trained at
she learned
she was instructed
she mastered
she was graduated
she was formed
she was qualified
she was competent
she was professional
she was capable
she was proficient
she was well educated
she was skilled
she was promised
she was extubated
she was noted
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
55 human-written examples
She was trained in CPR.
News & Media
She was trained, she said.
News & Media
She was trained by Peter Walwyn.
News & Media
Before getting her PhD in history, she was trained in computational condensed matter physics.
She was trained as an Agricultural and Environmental Engineer from McGill University, Canada.
Academia
She was trained to knock on our roommate's door if she needed anything.
News & Media
She was trained in the ritual part by a Conservative rabbi.
News & Media
She was trained with 50 other girls, most of them orphans like her.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
3 human-written examples
With the help of a UNICEF-supported programme she was trained in hairdressing and cosmetology, and how to run a small business.
Formal & Business
Use your vet, he/she was trained for this they know what to do and pick a vet you trust.
Wiki
For both jobs, she said she was trained only by other interns.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Specify the area of training to provide context. For example, use "she was trained in CPR" rather than just "she was trained".
Common error
Avoid using "she was trained" without specifying the field or skill. It lacks context and reduces clarity. Instead of saying "she was trained", specify what she was trained in, such as "she was trained as a nurse."
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "she was trained" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject ('she') received training, rather than actively performing the training. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used. It serves to describe a past event where skills or knowledge were imparted.
Frequent in
News & Media
52%
Academia
19%
Science
11%
Less common in
Formal & Business
10%
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
3%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "she was trained" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that a person has received specific training or instruction. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and frequently used across various contexts. It’s most common in news and media, academia, and scientific publications. For clarity, specify the training area. Related alternatives include "she received training" and "she underwent training". While generally neutral, the level of formality can adjust based on context. Using the phrase effectively involves specifying the type of training received to avoid overgeneralization.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
she received training
Uses "received" instead of "was trained", emphasizing the act of getting training.
she underwent training
Replaces "was trained" with "underwent", highlighting the process or experience of training.
she had training
Simplifies the structure to "she had" emphasizing possession of training.
she was educated
Substitutes "trained" with "educated", suggesting a more formal or academic learning process.
she learned
Uses "learned" to describe the acquisition of skills or knowledge.
she gained expertise
Focuses on the outcome of the training, which is acquiring expertise.
she developed skills
Highlights the development of skills as a result of the training.
she was coached
Indicates a more personal and guided form of training.
she was instructed
Uses "instructed" suggesting a formal teaching environment.
she mastered
Implies a high level of proficiency achieved through training.
FAQs
How to use "she was trained" in a sentence?
Use "she was trained" to indicate that someone received instruction or education in a particular skill or field. For example, "She was trained as an engineer" or "She was trained in martial arts".
What can I say instead of "she was trained"?
You can use alternatives like "she received training", "she underwent training", or "she was educated" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "she was trained at" or "she was trained in"?
Both are correct, but "she was trained in" is typically used to specify the subject or skill (e.g., "she was trained in first aid"), while "she was trained at" is used to specify the institution or place (e.g., "she was trained at Harvard").
What is the difference between "she was trained" and "she is trained"?
"She was trained" indicates that the training happened in the past, whereas "she is trained" implies that she currently possesses the training or the state of being trained is ongoing or relevant.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested