severe losses for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "severe losses for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing significant negative impacts or damages experienced by a person, organization, or entity. Example: "The company reported severe losses for the last quarter due to unexpected market fluctuations."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

The foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in 2001 had a dire effect on the livestock industry, forcing the slaughter of several million animals mostly sheep but also cattle, pigs, and other animals and causing severe losses for agriculture.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The alternative would probably be a default by Greece, with more severe losses for creditors.

The New York Times

Many people could or would not forget his record as First Lord of the Admiralty during the First World War; in 1915, he was demoted, after a naval campaign in the Dardanelles which he had championed turned into a disaster, entailing severe losses for Britain and its allies.

The New Yorker

We believe some paths of contagion lead to severe losses for the longs and huge gains for the shorts.

Forbes

The assumption that the Germans would be put off by losses was wrong; it would have taken severe losses for the OKL to change its mind on target selection.

Wikipedia

However, an obvious reduction of yield was observed when the water content reduced to 40%, and even more severe losses for the 25-30% and 30-35% of soil moisture conditions with less than 1/5 of the control for the extreme drought.

BMC Plant Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Mr. Taseer's death will also be a severe loss for the governing Pakistan Peoples Party and President Asif Ali Zardari; Mr. Taseer was the president's personal friend and close political ally.

The New York Times

His abdication was a severe loss for us".

Wikipedia

And although he believes that Dimon would ensure a graceful, seamless exit even if it comes sooner, Dimon's departure would nonetheless mean a "pretty severe loss" for Wall Street.

Los Angeles Times

Richard Dicker, head of international justice at HRW, said Libya's refusal to abide by ICC rulings put it in violation of the UN, which ordered the investigation of Gaddafi: "It would be a severe loss of credibility for the new Libyan government for them to put themselves in breach of a security council resolution".

The Guardian

The notable exception is for severe loss of libido, which remains for >30% women irrespective of allocated treatment group.

British Journal of Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "severe losses for", ensure the context clearly establishes what is being lost and who or what is experiencing the losses. Providing specific details enhances clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the severity of the losses. Use factual data and precise language to accurately represent the situation. Overuse of intensifiers can weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "severe losses for" functions as a descriptor, indicating substantial negative impacts or detriments experienced by a person, entity, or group. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "severe losses for" is a grammatically correct and usable expression to describe significant negative impacts experienced by an entity. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's suitable for various contexts, primarily in science, news, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, it's important to provide context and factual details to accurately represent the situation, avoiding exaggeration. Alternatives like "significant setbacks for" or "major deficits for" may be considered depending on the specific context. While not extremely common, its appropriate usage in reputable sources confirms its reliability and effectiveness in conveying serious consequences.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant setbacks for

Replaces "losses" with "setbacks", focusing on the hindrance caused.

major deficits for

Substitutes "losses" with "deficits", highlighting the shortfall.

substantial detriments to

Emphasizes the damaging effect, using more formal language.

serious economic damage for

More directly conveys the economic implications of the losses.

critical disadvantages for

Focuses on the negative competitive impact.

considerable economic harm to

Highlights the economic detriment suffered.

harsh repercussions for

Highlights the consequence aspect of the losses.

grave financial blows to

Specifically addresses the financial aspect of the losses.

profound disadvantages for

Emphasizes the degree of the negative consequences.

deep financial cuts for

Emphasizes a reduction in funding or financial resources.

FAQs

How can I use "severe losses for" in a sentence?

Use "severe losses for" to describe significant negative outcomes affecting a specific entity. For example, "The company reported "severe losses for" the fiscal year."

What are some alternatives to "severe losses for"?

Alternatives include "significant setbacks for", "major deficits for", or "substantial detriments to depending on the specific context".

Is it more appropriate to say "severe losses for" or "significant losses for"?

Both phrases are acceptable, but "severe losses for" implies a greater magnitude of loss compared to "significant losses for". Choose the phrase that most accurately reflects the situation.

Can "severe losses for" be used in both formal and informal contexts?

While generally suitable for formal contexts, "severe losses for" can be used in informal settings if the situation warrants it. However, consider using less formal alternatives like "big losses" or "major setbacks" for a more relaxed tone.