set up by

USAGE SUMMARY

"set up by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating who or what has instituted or initiated something. For example: "The rules of the game were set up by the school principal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Set up by Ryan.

The New Yorker

The IPT was set up by Ripa.

The Guardian - Opinion

So I set up by myself.

The Guardian

Hillary was set up by a con".

The New Yorker

A roadblock set up by armed rebels?

The Guardian - Film

This model is set up by the following steps.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

"It was all set up by the openers," Sangakkara said.

Independent

Those plays were set up by Lee's early success.

The New York Times - Sports

Companies set up by local governments borrowed heavily.

The New York Times

Our meeting was obviously set up by the universe.

The New Yorker

"Never set up by me," she kept pointlessly equivocating.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Maintain consistency in verb tense when describing actions related to what was "set up by". For instance, if something was "set up by" in the past, subsequent descriptions should generally remain in the past tense.

Common error

A common error is to assume the agent responsible for setting something up. Always clearly state who or what was responsible to avoid confusion. Don't leave it open to interpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "set up by" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used to indicate the agent or entity responsible for establishing, creating, or initiating something. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "set up by" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to attribute the creation, establishment, or initiation of something to a specific agent. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts. It is very common in News & Media and Science. For clarity, always specify the agent responsible. Consider alternatives like ""established by"", ""created by"", or ""organized by"" to fine-tune your meaning. Avoid ambiguity by clearly identifying the responsible party to ensure accurate communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

established by

Replaces "set up" with "established", emphasizing a more formal or permanent creation.

created by

Focuses on the act of bringing something into existence.

organized by

Highlights the structured arrangement or planning aspect.

founded by

Emphasizes the beginning or starting point of an organization or institution.

initiated by

Stresses the start or commencement of a process or project.

arranged by

Implies a deliberate and careful organization.

developed by

Highlights the process of growth or evolution under the guidance of someone.

instituted by

Suggests a formal or official establishment.

brought about by

Focuses on the cause or reason for something happening.

pioneered by

Highlights the innovative or groundbreaking nature of the creation.

FAQs

How can I use "set up by" in a sentence?

Use "set up by" to indicate who or what established or initiated something. For example: "The company was "founded by" a group of entrepreneurs."

What's the difference between "set up by" and "created by"?

"Set up by" often implies an organized or structured establishment, while "created by" simply indicates the act of bringing something into existence. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What can I say instead of "set up by"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "established by", "organized by", or "initiated by".

Is it always necessary to specify who or what "set up" something?

While not always grammatically required, specifying the agent responsible for setting something up provides clarity and context. Omission can sometimes lead to ambiguity.