set limits on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'set limits on' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe when someone has imposed a restriction or rule on something. For example: We need to set limits on the amount of time each student has to present their project.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Their limitations set limits on the complexity of the book.

The New Yorker

Some legislatures have set limits on such awards.

The New York Times

These set limits on discretionary spending several years ahead.

The Economist

Future laws must not just set limits on copyright, they must also set limits on copy prevention.

The Economist

Others set limits on brands accepted and make redeemers wait for hours for their money.

The New York Times

To ease the pressure to raise money, it set limits on candidate spending.

The New York Times

Gerta's parents hounded her to study and set limits on television and boyfriends.

The New York Times

To stop wealthy interests from buying access, the law set limits on contributions.

The New York Times

Another company would have set limits on the coverage Mr. Williams could buy.

The New York Times

Play was good, but Mister Rogers set limits on play and make-believe.

The New York Times - Arts

During the previous year's election campaign, Bush promised to set limits on power-plant emissions.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "set limits on", be specific about what is being limited and the reason for the limitation to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid setting limits that are too general; this can lead to unintended consequences. Instead, clearly define the scope and parameters of the restriction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "set limits on" functions as a verb phrase that indicates the action of imposing restrictions or boundaries on something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for use in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Academia

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "set limits on" is a versatile and frequently used expression for indicating the act of imposing restrictions or boundaries. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically sound and appropriate for various contexts, predominantly appearing in News & Media and Science sources. Its primary function is to control or restrict access, usage, or influence. While primarily neutral to professional in tone, the phrase's directness makes it suitable across various registers. To ensure clarity, it's advisable to specify the limitations and their rationale, avoiding overly broad restrictions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

impose restrictions on

This alternative emphasizes the act of enforcing limitations.

establish boundaries for

This option highlights the creation of defined limits or borders.

place constraints on

This suggests applying pressure or restrictions that affect freedom of action.

define the scope of

This focuses on specifying the extent or range of something.

put a cap on

This implies setting an upper limit or maximum value.

regulate the extent of

This refers to controlling or managing the degree to which something is allowed.

curtail the reach of

This indicates reducing the influence or impact of something.

restrict access to

This directly limits who or what can use or enter something.

control the use of

This emphasizes managing and directing how something is utilized.

moderate the intensity of

This suggests reducing the strength or force of something.

FAQs

How can I use "set limits on" in a sentence?

You can use "set limits on" to describe the act of imposing restrictions. For example, "The government should "set limits on" carbon emissions".

What are some alternatives to "set limits on"?

Alternatives to "set limits on" include phrases like "impose restrictions on", "establish boundaries for", or "place constraints on".

Is there a difference between "set limits on" and "set a limit on"?

"Set limits on" generally refers to establishing multiple restrictions or boundaries, while "set a limit on" refers to establishing a single, specific boundary. The choice depends on whether you're referring to a general practice or a specific instance.

When is it appropriate to use "set limits on" in writing?

It is appropriate to use "set limits on" in formal or informal writing when you want to convey the idea of imposing restrictions or boundaries, whether they are rules, amounts, or levels.