serious infringement

USAGE SUMMARY

"serious infringement" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is usually used when referring to a violation of the rules or law that results in serious consequences. For example, "The company was found guilty of a serious infringement of environmental regulations and was fined heavily".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

37 human-written examples

Mr Justice Mann said the victims had all suffered a "serious infringement of privacy".

Independent

"We have today put down a marker by imposing record fines for a serious infringement.

The Guardian - Business

Intercepting a person's private communications is a serious infringement of privacy.

The Guardian - Opinion

"This is a serious infringement on our civil liberties," Mr. Mayfield said.

The New York Times

Costello said it was a "very serious infringement" on "what we regard as civil society's voice".

The Guardian

The Foreign Office spokesman said: "This was a serious infringement of the principles of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

23 human-written examples

The behaviour is designed to prevent observers from reporting serious infringements of regulations.

The Guardian

Operators that have been sanctioned for serious infringements over the previous 12 months will not be authorised to fish abroad.

The Guardian

But the investigators' final report, released last fall, found no serious infringements of Hungarian law, and no charges were leveled.

The New York Times

Fifa's disciplinary panel "is responsible for sanctioning serious infringements which have escaped the match officials' attention," the governing body said in a statement.

Independent

77 lit. a of the Fifa Disciplinary Code (FDC), the Fifa Disciplinary Committee is responsible for sanctioning serious infringements which have escaped the match officials' attention.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "serious infringement", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific rule, law, or right is being violated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "serious infringement" for minor or trivial violations, as it can diminish the impact of the phrase when describing genuinely severe situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "serious infringement" functions primarily as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. It identifies a specific instance of a violation, emphasizing the gravity of the offense. Ludwig AI confirms this with numerous examples demonstrating its usage in similar contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "serious infringement" is a commonly used and grammatically correct term that identifies a significant violation of rules, laws, or rights. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's often used in news, business, and academic contexts, signaling the severity of the offense. When writing, ensure the context specifies the breached rule or right. Alternatives like "grave violation" or "major transgression" can be used depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

grave violation

Replaces 'infringement' with 'violation' and 'serious' with 'grave', emphasizing the severity.

major transgression

Substitutes 'infringement' with 'transgression' and 'serious' with 'major', indicating a significant offense.

severe breach

Uses 'breach' instead of 'infringement' and 'severe' in place of 'serious', highlighting the broken agreement or law.

critical contravention

Replaces 'infringement' with 'contravention' and 'serious' with 'critical', underscoring the importance of the rule broken.

substantial violation

Employs 'substantial' to describe the extent of the 'violation', indicating it is not minor.

flagrant abuse

Changes the phrase to focus on the 'abuse' aspect, with 'flagrant' emphasizing its obviousness and severity.

gross violation

Utilizes 'gross' to intensify the 'violation', suggesting it is shockingly bad.

egregious transgression

Replaces both words with more formal synonyms, heightening the sense of wrongdoing.

significant encroachment

Shifts the focus to 'encroachment', implying a gradual but important intrusion or violation.

pronounced violation

Uses 'pronounced' to describe the clarity and obviousness of the 'violation'.

FAQs

How can I use "serious infringement" in a sentence?

You can use "serious infringement" to describe a significant violation of a law, rule, or right. For example: "The company's actions were considered a "serious infringement" of consumer privacy."

What are some alternatives to "serious infringement"?

Alternatives include "grave violation", "major transgression", or "severe breach", depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is "serious infringement" formal or informal language?

"Serious infringement" is generally considered neutral to formal language, suitable for professional, legal, and news contexts. More informal situations might call for simpler phrasing.

What kind of actions qualify as a "serious infringement"?

A "serious infringement" typically involves actions that cause significant harm, violate fundamental rights, or break important regulations. Examples could be data breaches, fraud, or violations of constitutional rights.