serious inaccuracies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "serious inaccuracies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe significant errors or mistakes in information, data, or statements. Example: "The report was filled with serious inaccuracies that misled the entire team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

The site also had to correct some serious inaccuracies in its data, which some agents pointed out in angry posts to the site's blog.

The New York Times

Then on Friday, Jon Chapman, News International's director of legal affairs until this month, said in a statement that he wanted to cooperate with the committee to correct "serious inaccuracies in statements made" at last week's hearing.

The New York Times

Your article (Hungary PM: bring back death penalty and build work camps for immigrants, 29 April) contains a number of serious inaccuracies and distortions regarding Hungary's prime minister Viktor Orbán's recent statements about the death penalty and immigration.

The Guardian

A third, Jon Chapman, News International's director of legal affairs until this month, said in a statement last week he was also preparing to cooperate fully with the Parliament investigation and wanted to correct "serious inaccuracies" in the testimony given by Mr. Murdoch to lawmakers.

The New York Times

And your concluding judgment that the court's typically convoluted decisions represent "reasoned argument" is testimony to the degree of your confusion.Quentin QuadeMarquetteMilwaukee,Dentsu protestsSIR After reviewing your article "The perils of maturity" (August 2nd), we were surprised to find serious inaccuracies and extremely negative interpretations of some aspects of Dentsu's business.

The Economist

The commission is worried about serious inaccuracies.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

Former Secretary of State James A. Baker III, speaking for the Bush camp by satellite from Tallahassee, Fla., condemned the recounting by hand as a prelude to serious inaccuracy and manipulation.

The New York Times

Far from representing a risk, Mrs Robinson's visit showed the government's strong commitment to the improvement of human rights in our country.Alma Rosa MorenoMexican ambassadorLondonBerlusconi too busySIR – Your article on Silvio Berlusconi, Italy's prime minister, contains a serious inaccuracy ("He's sitting pretty", July 20th).

The Economist

Mr. Dimmock contended that the film included "serious scientific inaccuracies, political propaganda and sentimental mush".

The New York Times - Arts

An e-mail posted online dated 20 February that is allegedly from CellTex CEO David Eller to Slate claims that Elliot's article "contains serious factual inaccuracies that should be corrected [sic] indeed, you should pull the article down entirely".

Science Magazine

"There are serious factual inaccuracies in the filing, but we are not going to comment because it is ongoing litigation," a JPMorgan spokesman said in a statement.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the impact of errors, use "serious inaccuracies" to emphasize the severity of the mistakes and their potential consequences.

Common error

Avoid using "serious inaccuracies" when the errors are minor or inconsequential. Reserve the phrase for situations where the inaccuracies genuinely have a significant negative impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "serious inaccuracies" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or the complement of a preposition. It describes a situation where information contains significant errors. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

40%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "serious inaccuracies" effectively conveys the presence of significant errors. Grammatically sound and widely used across various reputable sources, it is particularly suited for contexts where accuracy and accountability are paramount. While versatile, it is crucial to reserve this phrase for situations where the errors truly have a notable impact. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correctness and usability, marking it as a valuable tool in professional and academic discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

major inaccuracies

Replaces "serious" with "major", indicating a significant level of error but maintaining the same structure.

significant inaccuracies

Substitutes "serious" with "significant", emphasizing the importance of the errors.

grave inaccuracies

Replaces "serious" with "grave", suggesting the errors are severe and potentially consequential.

critical inaccuracies

Uses "critical" instead of "serious", highlighting that the inaccuracies have a crucial impact.

substantial inaccuracies

Replaces "serious" with "substantial", indicating a considerable amount of error.

serious errors

Replaces "inaccuracies" with the more general term "errors".

serious mistakes

Substitutes "inaccuracies" with "mistakes", indicating faults resulting from poor judgment or carelessness.

notable inaccuracies

Uses "notable" instead of "serious", suggesting the inaccuracies are easily observed or worthy of attention.

glaring inaccuracies

Replaces "serious" with "glaring", meaning the inaccuracies are extremely obvious or conspicuous.

significant errors

Combines "significant" with "errors" for a more general expression of substantial mistakes.

FAQs

How can I use "serious inaccuracies" in a sentence?

You can use "serious inaccuracies" to describe significant errors in data, reports, or statements. For example: "The report contained "serious inaccuracies" that could mislead the public".

What are some alternatives to "serious inaccuracies"?

Alternatives include "major inaccuracies", "significant inaccuracies", or "grave inaccuracies", depending on the context and the severity you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "serious inaccuracies"?

It is appropriate when the errors or mistakes are not only present but also have a substantial impact or consequence. Avoid using it for trivial or minor errors.

Is there a difference between "serious inaccuracies" and "minor inaccuracies"?

"Serious inaccuracies" refer to significant errors that can lead to problems or misinterpretations, while "minor inaccuracies" are small, less consequential errors that typically don't have a major impact.