second trace of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "second trace of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the second occurrence or indication of something, often in contexts like research, analysis, or observation. Example: "The second trace of the chemical compound was found in the soil samples collected from the site."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

BGE 2, the second trace of Figure 3, utilizes a higher pH.

Analytical Chemistry

In Figure 3a a second trace of lower magnitude can be identified which is attributable to the reduced numbers of cattle slaughtered at the weekend.

BMC Veterinary Research

As is the case for several other event types, in Figure 4a a second trace of lower magnitude but similar cyclical pattern is present.

BMC Veterinary Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Second, tracing of developmental defects of enamel after such a long time was possible because teeth, once they have developed, do not undergo remodeling; that is, the defects are permanent in nature.

Environmental Health Perspectives

They were the first trace of the hurricane we had seen.

The New York Times

Then the first trace of uneasiness; the second, closer glance, followed by an expression of incredulity and dismay.

The New Yorker

In vertebrates, the first trace of gonad development is a thickening of the coelomic lining on either side of the dorsal mesentery and medial to the kidney rudiments.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The first trace of a swing to the right comes in a letter from 1915, in which Hitler expressed the hope that the war would bring an end to Germany's "inner internationalism".

The New Yorker

Indeed, the first was known unofficially as LGM1, because its discoverers half wondered whether they had come across the first trace of little green men in outer space.Dr Gold's explanation was only slightly more prosaic.

The Economist

A piece of debris found washed ashore on a beach in the Indian Ocean came from missing Malaysian Airlines flight MH370, the Malaysian prime minister has announced, confirming the first trace of the plane since it vanished last year with 239 people on board.

The Guardian

The IR spectra of pure rivastigmine (the first trace of Fig. 3) and the crushed powder of its tablet (second to fourth the traces of Fig. 3) peaks observed in the tablet's spectrum were also dominated by Splenda.

Journal of Analytical Science and Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "second trace of", ensure the context clearly establishes the existence of a first trace. This clarifies that you are referring to a subsequent observation or indication, enhancing clarity and avoiding ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "second trace of" without first establishing what the "first trace" was. Without this context, the phrase becomes confusing and lacks the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "second trace of" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies a subsequent, and often less prominent, indication or sign of something. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "second trace of" is a grammatically sound noun phrase used to denote a subsequent or less prominent indication of something. While relatively rare, as indicated by Ludwig AI, it appears most frequently in scientific, encyclopedic, and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure the prior existence of a "first trace" is established to provide adequate context. Alternatives such as "subsequent indication of" or "later sign of" can be employed to achieve a similar meaning. By adhering to these guidelines, writers can effectively and clearly communicate the presence of a follow-up observation or piece of evidence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subsequent indication of

Replaces "trace" with "indication" and "second" with "subsequent", emphasizing the following nature of the trace.

later sign of

Uses "sign" instead of "trace" and "later" instead of "second", focusing on the temporal aspect of the discovery.

additional hint of

Employs "hint" to convey a less pronounced trace and "additional" to indicate it follows a prior one.

another glimpse of

Substitutes "trace" with "glimpse", suggesting a fleeting or incomplete view.

further evidence of

Replaces "trace" with "evidence", giving a stronger sense of confirmation or proof.

follow-up sign of

Uses "follow-up" to highlight the sequential nature of the sign or indication.

recurring trace of

Focuses on the repetition of the trace, implying it has appeared before.

secondary mark of

Substitutes "trace" with "mark" and "second" with "secondary", indicating a less prominent or important sign.

echo of

Emphasizes the subtle and reminiscent nature of the second trace, suggesting it reflects something previously observed.

subsequent vestige of

Replaces "trace" with "vestige", implying a remaining piece of something from the past.

FAQs

How can I use "second trace of" in a sentence?

Use "second trace of" to indicate a subsequent or less prominent indication of something. For example, "The "second trace of" contamination was found near the riverbank".

What can I say instead of "second trace of"?

Alternatives include "subsequent indication of", "later sign of", or "additional hint of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "second trace of"?

It's appropriate when you want to highlight that something is not the initial or primary indication, but rather a later or less prominent one. Ensure a "first trace" has already been established in the context.

Is there a difference between "first trace of" and "second trace of"?

Yes, "first trace of" refers to the initial indication or evidence, while "second trace of" indicates a subsequent, and possibly less significant, indication. The "first trace of" something is the original detection; the second builds upon that.