scope of obligations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "scope of obligations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the extent or range of responsibilities or duties that are required in a particular context, such as legal, contractual, or organizational settings. Example: "The contract clearly outlines the scope of obligations for both parties involved, ensuring that each understands their responsibilities."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

And that can lead to the idea that Tamny seems to have embraced: regular shutdowns are the best way to limit not only the size of the federal government but also the scope of obligations we have to one another.

The New York Times

The precise scope of obligations arising from relationships is a matter of considerable debate.

BMC Public Health

In the case of studies targeting particular communities, especially ethnically-defined communities, the scope of obligations may be extended to the relevant study communities.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

However, debates continue in the academic bioethics literature relating to defining benefits, beneficiaries, and the scope of obligations for providing benefits.

BMC Medical Ethics

In addition, children's environmental health research can involve particularly vulnerable communities and thus can raise questions about the conditions for informed consent, the appropriateness of incentives to participate, the scope of obligations to report findings, and protections for privacy.

Environmental Health Perspectives

In the last decade however, there has been intense debate within academic bioethics literature seeking to define the benefits, the beneficiaries, and the scope of obligations for providing these benefits.

BMC Medical Ethics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

The global economic system gives rise to distributive obligations, but the scope of the obligation is limited to the public goods produced by the system itself, in the event it comes to produce them (whether it currently does so is a matter of controversy).

SEP

Mr. Obama expanded the scope of federal obligations during his first term through short-term stimulus programs and the new health care law.

The New York Times

"The rationale for this requirement is that the governing documents define the scope of monetary obligations which co-op shareholders or condominium unit owner agrees to when they buy into a building," Mr. Cholst said.

The New York Times

In a press release last month, the Federation Against Software Theft argued that the introduction of 4G networks (as well as wider availability of public Wi-Fi) justifies widening the scope of legal obligations placed on internet service providers to include mobile network operators.

The Guardian

Often, also, the actual scope of the obligations imposed on the State depends on the legal solutions adopted by them at a level of national legislation.

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "scope of obligations", clearly define the specific context to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify whether you're referring to legal, contractual, or ethical obligations.

Common error

Avoid using "scope of obligations" without specifying the parties involved or the subject matter. Always provide enough context to ensure clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "scope of obligations" functions as a noun phrase that specifies the extent or range of duties and responsibilities. According to Ludwig AI, it is correct and usable. It's often used in legal, contractual, and ethical contexts to define the boundaries of what is required or expected.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

63%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "scope of obligations" is a grammatically correct and semantically valid term used to define the extent and nature of duties and responsibilities. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various formal contexts, particularly in legal, contractual, and ethical settings. While not extremely common, it is found primarily in scientific, news and media, and formal business domains. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the relevant parties and subject matter to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "extent of liabilities" or "breadth of responsibilities" can be considered depending on the specific nuance you aim to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

extent of liabilities

This alternative emphasizes the legal or financial responsibilities one has.

range of duties

This option replaces "obligations" with "duties", focusing on the tasks one must perform.

breadth of responsibilities

This highlights the comprehensive nature of the duties involved.

limits of accountability

This focuses on defining the boundaries of who is answerable for what.

magnitude of commitments

This emphasizes the seriousness and extent of promised actions.

degree of liability

This relates specifically to legal or financial exposure and its extent.

full extent of requirements

This highlights all the mandates and needs within a certain task.

parameters of duties

This specifies the defining characteristics or boundaries of required tasks.

the nature of responsibilities

This focuses more on the kind of duties involved than their range.

sphere of accountability

This alternative focuses on the area in which someone is held responsible.

FAQs

How can I use "scope of obligations" in a sentence?

You can use "scope of obligations" to describe the extent of duties and responsibilities. For example: "The contract defines the "scope of obligations" for each party involved."

What is the difference between "scope of obligations" and "range of duties"?

"Scope of obligations" refers to the extent and nature of mandatory actions, while "range of duties" typically refers to the variety of tasks one is expected to perform. The former has a stronger connotation of a binding requirement.

What are some alternatives to "scope of obligations"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases such as "extent of liabilities", "breadth of responsibilities", or "limits of accountability".

In what contexts is "scope of obligations" most appropriate?

"Scope of obligations" is particularly useful in legal, contractual, and ethical discussions where the exact boundaries of responsibilities need to be clearly defined. Ludwig can also provide examples of use in more complex situations.