scholarly feedback

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "scholarly feedback" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to constructive criticism or evaluations provided by experts or peers in an academic context. Example: "The professor provided scholarly feedback on my research paper, highlighting areas for improvement and suggesting additional sources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mentoring sessions in business plan competitions provide the participants with various benefits including but not limited to advice and feedback, scholarly sounding boards, and networking with experts (Clutterbuck and Megginson 2004).

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

At the end of the program, many of the participants were invited to present their own scholarly work and received feedback from Chicago faculty.

University of Chicago

Truscott's strong opposition to WCF has faced numerous challenges and received critiques from researchers, who, through empirical research or other scholarly synthesis, have argued that grammar feedback is essential for second language acquisition (SLA) and should remain an important component of L2 instruction2 (e.g., Guénette 2007; Ferris 2004; Hyland and Hyland 2006).

Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education

The scholarly publishing area is full of complicated feedback loops and perverse economic incentives, to the extent that I have often compared it to the American medical sector.

Nature

The show material is based on scholarly research on inter-ethnic relations and feedback from focus groups, and it forms part of a larger educational campaign here devoted to diversity.

The New York Times - Arts

Her current scholarly interests include human papillomavirus (HPV), p16, GME, feedback, competence, milestones, professionalism and generational differences in learners.

Duke University

Some of the participants were invited to present their own scholarly work at a Summer Institute colloquium, where they received feedback from Law School faculty.

University of Chicago

The colloquium is also intended to give students practice and feedback pertaining to the arts of presentation and scholarly dialog, while introducing seminal issues and fundamental works in the field.

Stanford University

These achievements are marked by feedback from across the EvoS campuses, the resultant scholarly work produced by participating students, and faculty collaborations spurred by exposure to the organization.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

The compendium experience was also intended to position game-based learning as the topic of open scholarly discourse, available for students, educators and practitioners alike, and where feedback and commentary is part of the participatory learning of online environments and in keeping with the flexible and learner-focused cognitive frame of #gbl.

International Journal for Educational Integrity

While online tests are commonly set up to give feedback about the correctness of the student's response to the question, some of the scholarly articles reviewed reported on improved student performance when immediate corrective feedback, or feedback about how to improve performance, was built into the test (Epstein, Lazarus, Calvano, & Matthews, 2002; Gipps, 2005; Kibble, 2007).

Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "scholarly feedback" when you want to emphasize that the feedback is based on academic knowledge and expertise.

Common error

Avoid simply asking for "any feedback." Instead, specify the areas where you need the most help, such as methodology, literature review, or clarity of arguments. This prevents receiving generic comments that lack depth.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "scholarly feedback" functions as a noun phrase, where 'scholarly' acts as an adjective modifying 'feedback'. It describes a specific type of feedback that is informed by academic knowledge and rigor. Ludwig examples show this in contexts of research evaluation and academic improvement.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Academia

35%

Science

33%

News & Media

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

Scholarly feedback is a term used to describe evaluations or constructive criticism grounded in academic expertise. It's grammatically correct and primarily functions within formal and scientific registers, as suggested by its prevalence in academic and research contexts. While Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correctness, examples are limited, indicating it may not be as commonly used as simpler alternatives like "academic critique" or "peer review comments". When seeking or providing such feedback, specificity is key to ensuring relevance and actionability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

academic critique

Focuses specifically on a critical evaluation within an academic setting.

peer review comments

Highlights feedback received from colleagues or peers in the same field.

expert evaluation

Emphasizes the evaluation being conducted by someone with significant expertise.

constructive criticism in academia

Specifies that the criticism is intended to be helpful and improve academic work.

scholarly assessment

Uses a more formal term for evaluation, emphasizing its academic nature.

intellectual input

Broader term referring to contributions and suggestions within a scholarly discussion.

academic guidance

Highlights advice and direction provided within an academic context.

feedback from academics

Directly states that the feedback is coming from academic professionals.

research evaluation

Specifically focuses on the evaluation of research work.

critical academic review

Emphasizes a thorough and critical examination of academic material.

FAQs

How can I use "scholarly feedback" effectively to improve my research?

To use "scholarly feedback" effectively, be open to criticism, ask clarifying questions, and prioritize feedback based on your goals and the reviewer's expertise. Focus on addressing major concerns first.

What distinguishes "scholarly feedback" from general feedback?

"Scholarly feedback" is characterized by its grounding in academic knowledge, rigorous methodology, and focus on intellectual rigor. General feedback may lack this depth and specificity.

What are some alternatives to "scholarly feedback" that I can use in my writing?

You can use alternatives like "academic critique", "peer review comments", or "expert evaluation" depending on the specific context.

How can I provide constructive "scholarly feedback" to my peers?

To provide constructive "scholarly feedback", focus on specific aspects of the work, offer balanced criticism, and suggest actionable improvements. Frame your feedback in a positive and supportive manner.