satisfactory argument

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "satisfactory argument" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the quality or validity of a reasoning or claim in a debate, essay, or analysis. Example: "The author presented a satisfactory argument that effectively addressed the counterpoints raised by critics."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

But brandishing "bedroom tax" (an unpopular welfare cut used as an emblem of Tory (read: English) callousness by nationalists) or "George Osborne" before audiences, as Mr Salmond repeatedly did, does not a satisfactory argument make.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Nevertheless, this paper does not provide satisfactory arguments to justify the use of EPI rather than the other existing tools used up till now to estimate the diversity within a homologous family.

Biology Direct

In general, there are no fully satisfactory philosophical arguments for the thesis that model-theoretic validity is unsound with respect to logical truth in higher-order languages.

SEP

So, contrary to the claim advanced by Robert Adams (1985, 245), even if there were veridical religious experiences, they would not provide one with a satisfactory defense against the argument from evil.

SEP

The committee's chairman, Labor senator Sam Dastyari, said the unanimous view of the committee was that "BHP's failure to give answers and basic information was far from satisfactory … and their arguments about it being commercial in confidence were undermined by Rio Tinto sitting beside them at the hearing and being prepared to give the same information".

The Guardian

The appeal to human cognitive limitations does raise a very important issue, and we have seen that one very natural account of the logical form of the inductive step in the case of a direct inductive argument is not satisfactory.

SEP

They speculate that Sir Richard may simply be engaging in a spot of empire-building.None of these arguments seem entirely satisfactory, however.

The Economist

Readers said the "free speech" argument was not a satisfactory defense of these activities.

The New York Times - Magazine

If you are a pacifist this argument will never be satisfactory.

Huffington Post

As we have seen (§2.4), nobody has yet provided a satisfactory scheme that characterizes successful analogical arguments.

SEP

Although its overall argument cannot be regarded as satisfactory, the pamphlet is nevertheless worth reading both for its historical significance and for its value as a fairly brief introduction to Bradley's thought.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "satisfactory argument", ensure that the context clearly defines what criteria constitute 'satisfactory' for your audience. Specify the standards for acceptance to strengthen your communication.

Common error

Avoid presenting a "satisfactory argument" as an irrefutable proof. Acknowledge its limitations and potential counterarguments to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "satisfactory argument" functions as an adjective-noun combination, where 'satisfactory' modifies 'argument'. It describes an argument that meets a certain standard or requirement, although it may not be entirely convincing or perfect. Ludwig AI confirms that this is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "satisfactory argument" is grammatically correct and denotes an argument that meets a minimum level of acceptability, without necessarily being completely persuasive or convincing. As Ludwig AI explains, it's a neutral term suitable for various contexts, including news, science, and academic discussions. While not exceedingly common, it effectively conveys that an argument is adequate but may have limitations. When employing this phrase, clarity is key: ensure your audience understands the criteria defining 'satisfactory' in that specific scenario.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

acceptable rationale

Replaces "argument" with "rationale" while maintaining the sense of adequacy.

sufficient reasoning

Substitutes "satisfactory" with "sufficient" emphasizing the adequacy of the reasoning process.

adequate justification

Replaces both words to convey a similar concept of providing a reasonable explanation.

reasonable case

Uses "case" instead of "argument" to describe a set of reasons presented.

suitable explanation

Emphasizes the appropriateness of the explanation rather than its irrefutability.

passable defense

Indicates that the defense is just good enough to be accepted.

serviceable logic

Implies the logic is functional and meets the basic requirements.

competent reasoning

Highlights the skill and ability in the reasoning presented.

valid point

Focuses on the correctness and soundness of a single point within an argument.

tenable position

Suggests that the position or stance is defensible and can be maintained.

FAQs

How can I use "satisfactory argument" in a sentence?

You can use "satisfactory argument" to describe a rationale that meets a certain standard of acceptability but isn't necessarily perfect. For example: "The lawyer presented a "satisfactory argument" for his client's innocence, although some doubts remained".

What's a more formal alternative to "satisfactory argument"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "sufficient reasoning" or "adequate justification", which convey a similar meaning with increased formality.

Is there a difference between a "satisfactory argument" and a "convincing argument"?

Yes, a "satisfactory argument" meets a minimum requirement of acceptability, while a "convincing argument" is persuasive and compelling, likely to change someone's opinion. A convincing argument goes beyond merely being satisfactory.

When is it appropriate to describe an argument as "satisfactory"?

It's appropriate when the argument meets the basic requirements or expectations but may not be fully persuasive or complete. It implies a level of acceptance without necessarily implying strong agreement.