sanctions against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "sanctions against" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to describe a punishment or set of punishments imposed by an individual, group, or organization (such as a government) against another individual, group, or organization. For example: "The United Nations imposed economic sanctions against North Korea in response to their nuclear weapons program."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

sanctions against Tehran.

The New York Times

Sanctions against the paper?

Independent

Sanctions against Iran work.

The Guardian - Opinion

It called for sanctions against both countries.

The Economist

We've mobilized sanctions against that government.

The New York Times

Oil-market sanctions against Iran are risky.

The New York Times

Sanctions against Syria are a possibility.

The Economist

It calls for sanctions against both countries.

The Economist

The sanctions against Maj.

The New York Times

We have sanctions against us.

The Guardian

2009: Barack Obama renews the sanctions against Burma.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "sanctions against", clearly specify who is imposing the sanctions and on whom or what they are being imposed. This provides clarity and context.

Common error

Avoid using "sanctions against" without a clear target. Always specify who or what is being sanctioned to prevent ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sanctions against" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a verb or noun to indicate the target of a punitive action. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "sanctions against" is a commonly used prepositional phrase that describes the imposition of penalties or restrictive measures. Ludwig AI validates its correct usage across diverse contexts, primarily in news, academia, and formal settings. While grammatically sound, it's crucial to specify the target of the sanctions for clarity. Alternatives like "penalties for" or "restrictions on" can be used depending on the desired nuance. Understanding these aspects ensures effective and precise communication when discussing sanctions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

measures against

A more general term for actions taken.

punitive measures targeting

More formal and emphasizes the intent to punish.

penalties for

Focuses on the penalties imposed rather than the act of sanctioning.

restrictions on

Emphasizes the limiting aspect of the measures.

consequences for

Highlights the result of an action, implying penalties.

economic pressure on

Specifically refers to economic actions used as leverage.

retaliatory actions against

Highlights the reciprocal nature of the measures.

disciplinary actions against

Suggests a formal process of reprimand.

trade barriers against

Focuses on obstacles to commerce.

embargo on

Specifically refers to a ban on trade.

FAQs

How are "sanctions against" typically implemented?

The phrase "sanctions against" often refers to economic restrictions, such as trade embargoes or asset freezes, imposed by one entity (e.g., a country or international organization) on another. These measures aim to influence the sanctioned entity's behavior.

What are some alternatives to "sanctions against"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "penalties for", "restrictions on", or "punitive measures targeting".

What is the difference between "sanctions against" and "measures against"?

"Sanctions against" typically implies economic or political penalties, whereas "measures against" is a broader term that can include any type of action taken to address a problem or issue.

Is it always negative to impose "sanctions against" a country?

While "sanctions against" often aim to correct negative behavior, they can also have unintended consequences, such as harming the civilian population or destabilizing the economy of the targeted country. The effectiveness and ethical implications of sanctions are frequently debated.