restrictions on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'restrictions on' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when referring to limitations, rules, or regulations that are placed upon a certain person, activity, or thing. For example: "The government imposed restrictions on travel to help prevent the spread of the virus."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Any restrictions on applying?

Independent

Restrictions on brewing were loosened.

The New York Times - Arts

Restrictions on contraception were lifted.

Independent

Tightening restrictions on gun ownership.

The New Yorker

Restrictions on liquids remain.

The New York Times

Restrictions on individuals remain.

The New York Times

Restrictions on foreign travel had been lifted.

Encyclopedia Britannica

There are no restrictions on foreign buyers.

The New York Times

India has loosened restrictions on equipment imports.

The New York Times

Restrictions on the media are increasing.

Independent

State restrictions on television are murkier.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or formal limitations, use "restrictions on" to maintain clarity and precision. For example, "There are strict "restrictions on" foreign investment in certain sectors."

Common error

Avoid using "restrictions on" in casual conversation; simpler alternatives like "limits" or "rules" may be more appropriate. For instance, instead of saying "There are too many "restrictions on" what I can eat", try "There are too many limits on what I can eat."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "restrictions on" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, indicating limitations or regulations placed upon something. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable status in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Academia

25%

Science

23%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "restrictions on" is a versatile and widely used expression to denote limitations, rules, or regulations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and appears frequently in various contexts, especially in news, academic, and scientific domains. When writing, remember to use "restrictions on" for formal contexts requiring precision, but consider simpler alternatives like "limits" in casual settings. Be mindful of the subtle differences between "restrictions on" and related phrases like "limitations of", ensuring accurate usage. By understanding these nuances, you can effectively communicate the presence and impact of limitations in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limitations regarding

Focuses on the limiting aspect but uses a different preposition and noun.

regulations concerning

Similar to "restrictions on" but uses "regulations" for a legal or official nuance.

constraints upon

Replaces "restrictions" with "constraints" and "on" with "upon", offering a more formal tone.

rules governing

Shifts the focus to the rules that are causing the restrictions.

curbs on

A more concise and informal way of expressing restrictions.

conditions applied to

Emphasizes the conditions that impose restrictions.

provisions for

Emphasizes the specific provisions that lead to the limitations.

qualifications for

Highlights the qualifications that act as restrictions.

impediments to

Focuses on the hindering aspect of restrictions, implying obstacles.

encumbrances on

Implies a burden or weight caused by the restrictions.

FAQs

How can I use "restrictions on" in a sentence?

Use "restrictions on" to indicate limitations or regulations imposed on something. For example: "The new law places "restrictions on" the sale of firearms."

What are some alternatives to "restrictions on"?

You can use alternatives such as "limitations regarding", "constraints upon", or "regulations concerning" depending on the context.

Is it better to use "restrictions on" or "limitations of"?

"Restrictions on" typically refers to imposed rules or limitations, while "limitations of" refers to inherent weaknesses or boundaries. For example, "restrictions on travel" versus "limitations of technology".

What is the difference between "restrictions on" and "limitations on"?

While similar, "restrictions on" often implies external rules or laws, whereas "limitations on" can refer to inherent constraints or boundaries. "Restrictions on free speech" versus "limitations on our resources".