sacrifice quality for

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence 'sacrifice quality for' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to describe the situation where someone compromises quality in exchange for something else, like quantity or cost. For example: "In an effort to produce large quantities of product, the company had to sacrifice quality for speed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

Don't sacrifice quality for speed though.

The Guardian

Sometimes, spies have to sacrifice quality for portability.

The New York Times - Tech

"If we try to make more rods, we run the risk of saturating the market, and one would sacrifice quality for quantity".

The New York Times

It must also double-check the quality of each product, which can be exceptionally challenging given that production processes are complex and factories are sometimes known to sacrifice quality for profit.

The New York Times

In housing, there is a concern that the government's drive for more homes will sacrifice quality for quantity, as occurred in the building boom of the 1960s and 70s.

The Guardian

Will interference such as forbidding co-authorship with residents of the state's enemies, as happens in America under the guise of financial sanctions, become the norm An author-pays model is also likely to lower overall quality, as publishers who are willing to sacrifice quality for profit lower standards to gain market share.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

Some reviewers said he sacrificed quality for quantity, reusing material from book to book.

The New York Times

It is unlikely to have been alone in sacrificing quality for volume.

The Economist

William Eggleston's original plan of exhibiting low-cost prints of the entire series would mean sacrificing quality for scope.

The New York Times - Arts

If the weather trends keep up, he thinks that brewers could potentially just cut back on the amount of hops they use, sacrificing quality for cost.

The Guardian - Business

In the U.S., we are taught to train and play at high intensity, at times sacrificing quality for quantity and intensity of work.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "sacrifice quality for", clearly state what the quality is being sacrificed for (e.g., speed, cost, quantity) to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Ensure you include "for" to clearly indicate what the quality is being traded off for. Saying "sacrifice quality" alone is incomplete and lacks specific meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sacrifice quality for" functions as a verb phrase indicating a deliberate act of compromising the standard or excellence of something in exchange for another attribute. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

20%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "sacrifice quality for" is a common expression used to describe a situation where the quality of something is deliberately reduced or compromised in order to achieve another goal, such as speed, cost savings, or increased quantity. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. It’s important to use this phrase carefully and to clearly state what the quality is being sacrificed for, as ambiguity can lead to misinterpretations. Common alternatives include "compromise on quality for", "trade quality for" and "prioritize speed over quality".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compromise on quality for

Focuses on the act of compromising, slightly de-emphasizing the reason for the compromise.

trade quality for

Highlights the exchange aspect, implying a more direct swap of quality for something else.

value quantity over quality

Directly states the preference for quantity over quality.

lower standards in favor of

Emphasizes the lowering of standards as a deliberate choice.

prioritize speed over quality

Highlights speed as the preferred attribute.

put expediency over quality

Explicitly contrasts the value of speed or convenience against quality.

accept diminished quality for

Focuses on the acceptance of a lower standard.

forgo quality for

Suggests a deliberate decision to give up quality.

degrade quality in pursuit of

Emphasizes the decline in quality as a result of actively pursuing something else.

diminish quality to achieve

Highlights achieving a specific goal by reducing quality.

FAQs

How can I use "sacrifice quality for" in a sentence?

You can use "sacrifice quality for" to indicate a compromise, such as "The company decided to "sacrifice quality for" speed in production to meet the deadline."

What's a good alternative to "sacrifice quality for"?

Alternatives include "compromise on quality for", "trade quality for", or "prioritize speed over quality", depending on the context.

Is it always negative to "sacrifice quality for" something?

Not necessarily. While often negative, "sacrificing quality for" something like affordability can be a strategic decision to reach a broader market.

What factors should I consider before deciding to "sacrifice quality for" something?

Consider the long-term impact on reputation, customer satisfaction, and potential risks associated with lower quality. Assess whether the benefits of the trade-off outweigh the potential drawbacks.