rows and rows

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "rows and rows" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate a large number of something, usually arranged in a line. For example: "The field was covered in rows and rows of sunflowers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Rows and rows of jeeps.

The New Yorker

Rows and rows of little bungalows.

Independent

Rows and rows of kale.

The New Yorker

Rows and rows of beautiful brownstones.

The New York Times

"It's just rows and rows and rows of these tiny cottages in a line.

The New York Times

Rows and rows stood on their kickstands like shiny dominos.

The New York Times - Magazine

Photos, rows and rows of them, all dead and gone.

The Guardian - Travel

Rows and rows of victims, numbered and photographed.

The Guardian - Travel

Soon we trod outside, rows and rows of us.

The New York Times - Health

"There were literally rows and rows of trucks," he said.

The New York Times

There are rows and rows and rows and I don't think I've ever done that many signatures in my life before".

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing visual scenes, use "rows and rows" to help your audience quickly grasp the scale and structure of the items you are presenting.

Common error

Avoid using "rows and rows" when a simpler adjective like "many" or "numerous" would suffice, especially in formal or concise writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "rows and rows" functions as an adjectival phrase to emphasize the quantity and arrangement of items in a linear fashion. Ludwig AI indicates that it is correct to use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

89%

Wiki

2%

Academia

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "rows and rows" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to describe a large number of items arranged linearly. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for use in a variety of contexts, particularly in news and media. While versatile, it’s important to ensure that the phrase is not overused and that simpler alternatives are considered for conciseness. The phrase effectively conveys scale and repetition, enhancing visual descriptions in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a great number of lines

More direct alternative, simple substitution.

many lines

This alternative focuses on the linear arrangement and abundance.

numerous ranks

Replaces "rows" with "ranks", emphasizing an ordered arrangement.

a multitude of lines

Emphasizes the large quantity arranged in lines.

endless files

Highlights a seemingly infinite linear sequence.

repeated lines

Focuses on the repetition of the linear arrangement.

extensive arrays

Uses "arrays" to describe a structured and broad arrangement.

long series

Emphasizes the continuous sequence of items.

multiple tiers

Suggests arrangements stacked above each other.

successive lines

Focuses on the sequential nature of the lines.

FAQs

How can I use "rows and rows" in a sentence?

You can use "rows and rows" to describe a large quantity of items arranged linearly. For example, "The stadium had "rows and rows" of empty seats."

What can I say instead of "rows and rows"?

You can use alternatives like "many lines", "numerous ranks", or "a great number of lines" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "row and row" instead of "rows and rows"?

No, "rows and rows" is the correct plural form. "Row and row" is grammatically incorrect in this context, as it doesn't convey the intended meaning of multiple rows.

What is the difference between "rows and rows" and "aisles and aisles"?

"Rows and rows" typically refers to items arranged in a linear sequence, while "aisles and aisles" refers to passageways or corridors between rows. Although both refer to linear arrangements, they describe different aspects of it. Ludwig confirms the correctness of "rows and rows".