roughly equivalent contributions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "roughly equivalent contributions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing contributions that are similar in value or impact but not identical. Example: "In our analysis, we found that both teams made roughly equivalent contributions to the project's success."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

PCA produces variable loadings, which are roughly equivalent to the "weight" or contribution that each variable makes toward explaining the total variance.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

Over all, he said, the cost of contributing to its employees' retirement is "roughly equivalent" to a corporation's cost for contributing to a standard defined-contribution retirement plan.

The New York Times

Furthermore, the function is roughly symmetrical; semantic and phonological associates appear to make equivalent contributions to over-additive false recall from hybrid lists.

Journal of Memory and Language

All variants are roughly equivalent.

Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures

[and] possessed roughly equivalent bargaining power". Post, at 6.

Harvard University

The trimesters are roughly equivalent to specific developmental stages.

Harvard University

A euro is roughly equivalent to a dollar.

The New York Times - Food

Being roughly equivalent, though, does not mean being identical.

The New York Times

(A roughly equivalent John Deere tractor costs about forty-five thousand).

The New Yorker

Syllabus must indicate roughly equivalent meeting hours as are required in the equivalent Cornell course.

Cornell University

Which, translated from Washingtonese, means something roughly equivalent to "yes".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For enhanced clarity, quantify the degree of equivalence whenever possible. Instead of simply stating that contributions are "roughly equivalent", provide specific data or metrics to support the assertion.

Common error

Avoid treating "roughly equivalent contributions" as completely identical. Recognize that there are likely minor differences, and acknowledge these differences where relevant to maintain accuracy and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "roughly equivalent contributions" functions as a noun phrase that describes the nature of contributions. The adjective "roughly equivalent" modifies the noun "contributions", indicating that the contributions are similar in value or impact but not necessarily identical, as shown in Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

33%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "roughly equivalent contributions" is a grammatically correct and understandable way to describe contributions that are nearly equal but not perfectly identical. Ludwig AI indicates it's suitable for various contexts, particularly science, news, and academic writing. When employing this phrase, ensure that the comparison criteria are clear and avoid implying exact equality. Consider alternatives such as "approximately equal contributions" or "substantially similar contributions" for subtle nuances in meaning. While the phrase is versatile, providing specific data to support claims of equivalence enhances clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

approximately equal contributions

Replaces "roughly" with "approximately", offering a slightly more precise feel.

substantially similar contributions

Substitutes "roughly equivalent" with "substantially similar", suggesting considerable but not perfect equivalence.

nearly identical contributions

Replaces "roughly equivalent" with "nearly identical", indicating a high degree of similarity.

comparable contributions

Uses "comparable" to suggest that the contributions are similar enough to be compared.

analogous contributions

Emphasizes the similarity in function or effect of the contributions.

virtually the same contributions

Conveys a very high degree of similarity, almost to the point of being identical.

more or less equal contributions

Adds a degree of casualness while maintaining the meaning of approximate equality.

relatively equivalent contributions

Uses "relatively" to specify that the equivalence is dependent on the context.

roughly comparable inputs

Changes "contributions" to "inputs", shifting the focus to what is being put in rather than the outcome.

practically indistinguishable inputs

Highlights the near impossibility of telling the inputs apart.

FAQs

How can I use "roughly equivalent contributions" in a sentence?

You can use "roughly equivalent contributions" to describe situations where different elements provide similar value or impact, such as "In our analysis, we found that both teams made "roughly equivalent contributions" to the project's success."

What's the difference between "roughly equivalent contributions" and "exactly equal contributions"?

"Roughly equivalent contributions" implies a near similarity but acknowledges some differences, whereas "exactly equal contributions" suggests perfect equality. Use "roughly equivalent" when there are minor variations.

Which is more appropriate: "roughly equivalent contributions" or "similar contributions"?

"Roughly equivalent contributions" emphasizes the degree of sameness more strongly than "similar contributions". Choose "roughly equivalent" when the contributions are very close in value or impact.

What are some alternative phrases to "roughly equivalent contributions"?

You can use alternatives like "approximately equal contributions" or "substantially similar contributions" depending on the context and the degree of equivalence you want to convey.