room for doubt

USAGE SUMMARY

"room for doubt" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when there is uncertainty or a lack of clarity about a certain situation or fact. For example, "Given the inconclusive evidence, there's still room for doubt about the defendant's guilt."

✓ Grammatically correct

Eventuality

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There was room for doubt.

The New York Times - Arts

And there is certainly room for doubt.

The New York Times

That leaves little room for doubt.

The Economist

And there was room for doubt.

The New York Times

There was plenty of room for doubt.

The New York Times

But there's also ample room for doubt.

The New York Times

The tiles left no room for doubt.

The New York Times - Travel

The transcripts left no room for doubt.

The Guardian

There is no room for doubt.

The Guardian - Sport

There is no longer room for doubt.

The Guardian - Opinion

But he left room for doubt.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "room for doubt" to express uncertainty when evidence or information is not conclusive. It is particularly effective in formal writing and discussions where objectivity is important.

Common error

Avoid using "room for doubt" when the evidence clearly supports a conclusion. Using it in such cases may undermine your argument and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "room for doubt" functions as a noun phrase that signifies the existence of uncertainty or a lack of conclusive evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's commonly used to express that a situation or conclusion is not entirely certain. The examples provided by Ludwig illustrate its use in various contexts, indicating areas where questions or skepticism persist.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "room for doubt" is a commonly used phrase to express uncertainty or a lack of conclusive evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used in diverse contexts, from news and media to scientific discussions. The analysis indicates that its register is generally neutral, making it suitable for both formal and informal communications. If you're looking for alternatives, consider options such as "cause for skepticism" or "reason to question", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. When using the phrase, ensure that it accurately reflects the level of uncertainty and doesn't undermine your argument by implying doubt where strong evidence exists.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

uncertainty remains

Highlights the continued presence of doubt.

reason to question

Highlights the rationale for doubting a claim or statement.

scope for uncertainty

Highlights the extent or range where uncertainty is present.

cause for skepticism

Emphasizes the reason behind the doubt or disbelief.

potential for disbelief

Emphasizes the inherent chance that something isn't trustworthy.

grounds for disbelief

Focuses on the justification for not accepting something as true.

lingering questions

Highlights the unresolved nature of the issue

possibility of error

Highlights the chance that something could be incorrect.

margin of error

Highlights the degree of uncertainty in statistical contexts.

area of ambiguity

Highlights the unclear aspect of something.

FAQs

How can I use "room for doubt" in a sentence?

You can use "room for doubt" to indicate that there is uncertainty or a lack of complete clarity about something. For example, "Despite the evidence, there is still "room for doubt" about the defendant's guilt."

What are some alternatives to "room for doubt"?

Alternatives include phrases like "cause for skepticism", "reason to question", or "uncertainty remains", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "there is room for doubt" or "there is no room for doubt"?

The choice depends on the context. "There is "room for doubt"" indicates uncertainty, while "there is no "room for doubt"" asserts certainty.

What's the difference between "room for doubt" and "reasonable doubt"?

"Room for doubt" generally refers to a level of uncertainty, while "reasonable doubt" is a legal standard requiring enough uncertainty to prevent a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt needs to be justifiable and logical.