robust exchanges

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "robust exchanges" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe strong, effective, and meaningful interactions or communications, often in a professional or academic context. Example: "The conference facilitated robust exchanges of ideas among experts in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Likewise, robust exchanges will see increased traffic, transparency and competition.

The New York Times

And the "robust" exchanges haven't created much great, lasting harm either.

The Guardian - Opinion

And in political debate, the most robust exchanges should be encouraged.

The New York Times

"Through engagement, and despite robust exchanges, we are able to move forward on a central disarmament and nonproliferation issue".

The New York Times

He still has not come to terms with a corporate culture that sees key figures frequently engage in robust exchanges of views.

The Guardian - Sport

After a series of robust exchanges, the MPs raised the possibility of greater future public scrutiny of Prince Charles's tax arrangements.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

"We have had a robust exchange of views.

The Guardian - Business

"There was a robust exchange of views," a Whitehall source told the paper.

The Guardian

They had what a source described as a "robust" exchange of views.

Independent

It might also inhibit the free and robust exchange of comment and ideas that give democracy so much strength.

The Guardian

A feisty presence, Lady Hale invariably gives the impression of being up for a robust exchange of views.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "robust exchanges" to describe interactions that are not only frequent but also impactful and contribute significantly to a deeper understanding or resolution of a matter.

Common error

Avoid using "robust exchanges" when the interactions are merely frequent but lack depth or meaningful contribution. A high volume of superficial communication does not qualify as "robust exchanges".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "robust exchanges" functions as a noun phrase, where 'robust' modifies 'exchanges'. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and denotes strong and effective interactions, which aligns with its use in the provided examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "robust exchanges" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to describe strong, effective, and meaningful interactions, particularly in professional, academic, and news contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides numerous examples demonstrating its usage. When using this phrase, it's essential to ensure that the interactions are not merely frequent but also impactful. For alternative phrasing, consider "vigorous discussions", "dynamic interactions", or "spirited debates" to achieve similar semantic results. Be mindful of the register; while versatile, it leans toward neutral to professional tones.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

vigorous discussions

Emphasizes the energy and intensity of the discussions.

dynamic interactions

Highlights the active and evolving nature of the interactions.

spirited debates

Focuses on the enthusiasm and passion involved in the debates.

intense negotiations

Stresses the high stakes and seriousness of the negotiations.

productive dialogues

Highlights the positive and fruitful outcomes of the dialogues.

frank conversations

Focuses on the honesty and openness of the conversations.

lively interactions

Emphasizes the vibrancy and excitement of the interactions.

thorough discussions

Highlights the depth and comprehensiveness of the discussions.

substantial interactions

Stresses the significance and importance of the interactions.

forceful dialogues

Focuses on the power and impact of the dialogues.

FAQs

How can I use "robust exchanges" in a sentence?

You can use "robust exchanges" to describe meaningful interactions, like, "The conference facilitated "robust exchanges" of ideas among experts in the field."

What are some alternatives to "robust exchanges"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "vigorous discussions", "dynamic interactions", or "spirited debates".

What's the difference between "robust exchanges" and "frequent exchanges"?

"Robust exchanges" implies not only frequency but also depth and impact, whereas "frequent exchanges" simply indicates that interactions occur often, regardless of their substance.

In what contexts is it most appropriate to use "robust exchanges"?

It is most appropriate in professional or academic settings to describe interactions that lead to significant insights or progress. It can also be used in news and media to describe political debates or negotiations.