risks to consider

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "risks to consider" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing potential dangers or challenges that should be taken into account in a particular situation or decision-making process. Example: "Before proceeding with the investment, there are several risks to consider, including market volatility and regulatory changes."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

24 human-written examples

There are risks to consider.

The New York Times

However, there are two risks to consider.

The Washington Post

There are other less obvious risks to consider.

The New York Times

Choosing the celebrity and the cause is critical to success, and there are risks to consider.

The Guardian - Opinion

As this fictional negotiation story suggests, when you're selling a hot commodity that everyone wants to buy, there may be certain long-term risks to consider.

Harvard University

Brandt and Schneider agreed that a change could help facilitate more trades, although the same risks to consider when trading a player in March apply when dealing a player in October.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

Thus, it is extremely important for people at high risk to consider all foods that are not thoroughly cooked just before consumption as a potential source of L. monocytogenes.

The New York Times - Health

Vergine: One risk to consider is how the appropriate management of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) can be built in from the outset.

Forbes

Therefore, a first population at risk to consider for CI is patients with infections caused by pathogens with MICs close to the susceptibility breakpoint.

Annals of Intensive Care

Another important nuclear risk to consider is that of self-assured destruction, also known as the nuclear winter theory.

HuffPost

There are two kinds of baseline risk to consider: overall baseline risk for that endpoint, and the reversible component of that risk.

BMJ Quality and Safety

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "risks to consider", clearly define the specific risks you are referring to. This provides context and allows your audience to understand the implications of each risk.

Common error

Avoid using "risks to consider" as a vague placeholder. Instead, specify each risk and its potential impact to provide actionable insights and informed decision-making.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "risks to consider" functions as a noun phrase acting as an object of discussion or evaluation. Ludwig examples show its usage in introducing potential dangers or challenges that need to be taken into account. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

32%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "risks to consider" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that serves to introduce and emphasize the importance of evaluating potential negative outcomes. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and practical usability. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science contexts, the phrase encourages informed decision-making by highlighting potential dangers. While alternatives like "potential risks to evaluate" or "challenges to anticipate" exist, "risks to consider" maintains clarity and directness. It's essential to specify the risks being referenced, avoiding vague generalizations. Overall, understanding and applying this phrase effectively contributes to more thorough and insightful communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

potential risks to evaluate

Replaces "consider" with "evaluate", suggesting a more formal assessment process.

possible dangers to assess

Uses "dangers" instead of "risks", highlighting a potentially more severe outcome, and "assess" instead of "consider", implying a systematic analysis.

downsides to take into account

Directly addresses the negative aspects ("downsides") that should not be ignored.

challenges to anticipate

Focuses on "challenges" rather than "risks", framing the situation as something to be overcome, and "anticipate", which suggests proactive planning.

pitfalls to be aware of

Highlights potential negative consequences ("pitfalls") and emphasizes the importance of being informed.

factors to weigh

Presents a more general approach, where "factors" encompasses risks and other relevant elements, and "weigh" implies a balanced consideration.

threats to acknowledge

Uses stronger language ("threats") to emphasize the severity of the potential negative outcomes, and "acknowledge" which is more formal.

issues to contemplate

Uses "issues" to broaden the scope beyond just risks, and "contemplate" to suggest a more thoughtful and reflective approach.

aspects to examine

Shifts the focus to a detailed inspection of "aspects", implying a thorough investigation.

contingencies to plan for

Focuses on preparing for potential negative events ("contingencies") through strategic planning.

FAQs

How can I use "risks to consider" in a sentence?

You can use "risks to consider" to introduce a discussion about potential negative outcomes, for instance: "Before launching the new product, we need to outline the "risks to consider"".

What are some alternatives to saying "risks to consider"?

Alternatives include phrases like "potential risks to evaluate", "possible dangers to assess", or "challenges to anticipate", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "risks to consider" or "risks for consideration"?

"Risks to consider" is more direct and commonly used. "Risks for consideration" is grammatically correct but less frequent. Stick with ""risks to consider"" for clarity.

What's the difference between "risks to consider" and "factors to consider"?

"Risks to consider" specifically highlights potential negative outcomes, while "factors to weigh" is broader and includes positive and neutral elements as well.