right to judge

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "right to judge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing someone's authority or ability to make judgments about others or situations. Example: "Everyone has their own opinions, but I believe we should respect each other's right to judge based on our experiences."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Who has a right to judge me?

The Guardian - Opinion

Other people do not have the right to judge that.

The New Yorker

I don't have a right to judge him".

The New York Times

You have no right to judge another human being".

The New York Times - Books

He felt it gave him the right to judge me.

The Guardian - Books

"I ain't got no right to judge someone.

The Guardian - Sport

If he was, do we have the right to judge him for that?

The New York Times - Books

"It is not always right to judge everything in terms of commerciality," he said.

The New York Times

"We want the right to judge for ourselves whether to skip class," he said.

Independent

The main question is: does the Israeli court have the right to judge Barghouti?

The Guardian

Palestine is ours -- including Jerusalem -- and you have no right to judge us".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase “right to judge” to denote a justified or legitimate basis for forming an opinion or making an evaluation. Ensure clarity about the source and scope of this right within the context.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase “right to judge” to imply a universal or unrestricted authority. Be mindful of the context and specific limitations that might apply to the judgment in question.

Linguistic Context

The phrase “right to judge” functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a verb or preposition. As Ludwig AI confirms, it correctly expresses the legitimacy or justification for forming an opinion or making an evaluation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

15%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Science

4%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase “right to judge” is a common and grammatically correct expression used to discuss the legitimacy of making evaluations or forming opinions. As Ludwig AI validates, it appears frequently in news, academic, and general contexts. While versatile, it's important to consider the specific nuance you want to convey. Related phrases like “authority to assess” or “prerogative to decide” can provide alternative shades of meaning. The key to using “right to judge” effectively is ensuring clarity about the source and scope of this right, and being mindful of potential limitations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

competence to judge

Emphasizes the skill, knowledge, or qualification to make a judgment.

jurisdiction to adjudicate

Refers to the legal authority to hear and decide a case.

power to determine

Focuses on the ability to influence or control an outcome through judgment.

authority to assess

Focuses on the formal power or authorization to evaluate.

legitimacy to assess

Highlights the state or quality of being legitimate.

entitlement to evaluate

Highlights the perceived justification for making judgments.

prerogative to decide

Emphasizes a special right or privilege to make a determination.

capacity to discern

Emphasizes the mental ability to distinguish and evaluate.

license to critique

Suggests a permission, often implied or informal, to offer criticism.

freedom to appraise

Highlights the liberty to form an opinion or estimate the value of something.

FAQs

How can I use "right to judge" in a sentence?

You can use "right to judge" to express the legitimacy of someone's evaluation, as in "Do we have the "right to judge" him for that?" or "The public were "right to judge" her on how she responded".

What's an alternative to saying "right to judge"?

Alternatives include "authority to assess", "prerogative to decide", or "entitlement to evaluate", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always appropriate to claim a "right to judge"?

No, claiming a "right to judge" can be contentious. Consider the context and whether your judgment is based on legitimate expertise, relevant experience, or ethical principles. It's crucial to avoid being judgmental and ensure your opinion is well-founded.

What gives someone the "right to judge"?

The "right to judge" can stem from various sources, including legal authority, moral standing, relevant expertise, or agreed-upon standards within a community or organization. It's not always inherent but is often derived from a recognized basis.