riddled with faults

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "riddled with faults" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is full of errors or problems, often in a critical context. Example: "The report was riddled with faults, making it difficult to trust the conclusions drawn."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The inquiry has heard from several witnesses that Grenfell Tower was riddled with faults that accelerated the fire and made survival harder.

The Guardian

But one Guardian Money reader who relied on an AA inspection before buying a used Land Rover Discovery says he ended up with a car riddled with faults.

The Guardian - Money

The committee's letter to the home secretary highlights the disaster lying ahead: the Home Office has learnt no lessons from the Windrush scandal, ploughing on with an EU settlement scheme riddled with faults.

The Guardian - Opinion

It is here that the next big Indian earthquake is most likely to happen, although the entire subcontinent is riddled with faults on the verge of failure, having been under pressure for so long.How much that worries the authorities or, at least, how much they are willing to act on their worries is a different question.

The Economist

Indonesia is riddled with faults and volcanoes, so it often features eruptions and earthquakes.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

It is meant to foster national pride in a country that remains riddled with fault lines three years after the ouster of its idiosyncratic dictator, Muammar Gaddafi.

The Economist

By mid-1985, whad happearedred to be the unassailable fortress of the Duvalier system turned out to be riddled with fault lines.

Los Angeles Times

Your two editorials are riddled with error.

The New York Times

Scientists say quakes of a similar magnitude could happen in such cities, because the East is riddled with old faults, the legacy of the pushing and pulling that created the Appalachian Mountains and the Atlantic Ocean several hundred million years ago.

The New York Times - Science

Italy is riddled with seismic faults, but the area where the quakes occurred had long been considered to be at very low risk; it was not even listed on earthquake hazard maps until 2003.

The New York Times

But the quake is a salutary reminder that some of the world's leading companies have head offices that sit in a region that is riddled with earthquake faults.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "riddled with faults", ensure the subject genuinely suffers from multiple pervasive flaws, not just isolated issues. This emphasizes the severity and widespread nature of the problems.

Common error

Avoid using "riddled with faults" for minor or superficial problems. This phrase is best reserved for situations where the flaws are significant and deeply ingrained.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "riddled with faults" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun. It describes something that is thoroughly affected or permeated by numerous faults. As Ludwig AI confirms, the expression is grammatically correct. Examples found by Ludwig illustrate usage in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "riddled with faults" is a grammatically correct and usable expression in English, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It functions as an adjective phrase, typically used to describe something that contains numerous pervasive flaws or errors. While not extremely common, it's frequently found in news and media contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that the subject genuinely suffers from multiple, significant faults. Alternatives such as "full of defects", "plagued by errors", and "replete with flaws" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Remember to reserve "riddled with faults" for situations where the issues are substantial and deeply ingrained, avoiding its use for minor imperfections.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

full of defects

Emphasizes the abundance of imperfections rather than the pervasiveness implied by "riddled".

plagued by errors

Highlights the disruptive and troublesome nature of the errors.

replete with flaws

Implies a completeness in the presence of flaws, suggesting they are abundant and integral.

beset by problems

Focuses on the challenges and difficulties caused by the problems.

marred by imperfections

Highlights the negative impact of imperfections on the overall quality.

teeming with issues

Suggests a high concentration and density of problems.

impaired by shortcomings

Emphasizes the limiting effect of the shortcomings on functionality or performance.

damaged by defects

Highlights the harm or impairment caused by the defects.

compromised by errors

Indicates that the presence of errors has undermined the integrity or reliability.

burdened by deficiencies

Focuses on the weight and encumbrance caused by the deficiencies.

FAQs

How can I use "riddled with faults" in a sentence?

You can use "riddled with faults" to describe something that has many flaws or errors. For example, "The old building was "riddled with faults", making it unsafe to occupy".

What are some alternatives to "riddled with faults"?

Some alternatives include "full of defects", "plagued by errors", or "replete with flaws", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "riddled with faults" in formal writing?

Yes, "riddled with faults" is appropriate for formal writing, especially when critically assessing something. However, consider the specific context and audience to ensure it aligns with the overall tone and register.

What's the difference between "riddled with faults" and "containing some errors"?

"Riddled with faults" implies a pervasive and significant number of errors or flaws, suggesting a more severe problem than simply "containing some errors". The former indicates widespread issues, while the latter suggests only a few isolated mistakes.