richer in scope

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "richer in scope" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has a broader or more comprehensive range of ideas, themes, or elements. Example: "The new curriculum is richer in scope, covering a wider array of subjects and perspectives than the previous version."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Presentz is similar to Mozilla's PopcornMaker, which is richer in scope but not as focused as what you get with Presentz.

TechCrunch

MSCAN focuses on very high P predictions, while Cister is geared towards high values of R. It is noticeable that Stubb's performance is much below the rest, possibly because it uses distinct motif-to-motif transition probabilities, which can only be properly learned without overfitting from datasets richer in scope than the present one.

Bioinformatics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, Canada has done an incredible job of creating an exhibit rich in scope and contextualization, making it "the most significant display of the First Emperor's Terracotta Army ever showcased in North America", says Dr. Chen Shen, Senior Curator and Bishop White Chair of East Asian Art & Archaeology at the ROM.

Huffington Post

While the shortcomings of non-experimental, or quasi-experimental, designs have been frequently discussed [ 21], a well conducted and thoughtfully evaluated pre-post study can provide highly valuable information, be rich in scope and can profoundly capture the process being investigated [ 22].

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Specify what is "in scope" and "out of scope".

WikiHow

The content mark-up they have achieved looks set to become richer and wider in scope, and will doubtless extend to more of their own published content over time.

Biochemical Journal

His collection is rich and wide in scope..

Johns Hopkins University

Despite this adversity, he later said, he saw a world wide in scope, rich in opportunity and defined by individual success.

The New York Times

"Agnes Under the Big Top" is rich in feeling, wide in scope, teeming with poetry and sprinkled with Bulgarian.

The New York Times

Working within those confines, she has fashioned an extraordinary portrait, rich in detail, ambitious in scope, with a vast historical backdrop that informs but never overwhelms its remarkable subject.

The New York Times - Books

They were the opening-night heroes — partly for artistic reasons (it was a magnificently measured reading, rich in texture, grand in scope), but also for holding firm while everything around them at the coliseum staggers from one crisis to the next.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "richer in scope", ensure that you are comparing two distinct entities or versions, clearly demonstrating the expansion or enhancement of the latter. For example, 'The second edition of the textbook is "richer in scope" than the first, including several new chapters and case studies.'

Common error

Avoid using "richer in scope" without a clear point of comparison. It's more effective to state specifically what makes something 'richer' rather than using it as a vague compliment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "richer in scope" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun. It indicates that the noun it modifies possesses a broader or more comprehensive range of elements or topics compared to something else. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Academia

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "richer in scope" is a grammatically correct and valid way to describe something that has been expanded or enhanced to include more elements or topics. Though relatively rare, as shown by Ludwig, its usage is appropriate across multiple domains, but predominantly in news, scientific and academic writing. When using the phrase, make sure that a clear comparison is being made. Be mindful of alternative phrases, such as "more comprehensive", and that the selection fits the context well. Always be clear about what makes it 'richer' in order to effectively deliver your intended message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more comprehensive

Emphasizes completeness and inclusivity.

broader in coverage

Focuses on the extent of topics covered.

more extensive

Highlights the larger scale or reach.

wider in range

Stresses the variety and diversity included.

more detailed

Highlights the inclusion of finer points and specifics.

more in-depth

Emphasizes a deeper level of analysis and understanding.

more thorough

Highlights the completeness and meticulousness.

enhanced in scale

Indicates an increase in size or magnitude.

expanded in dimension

Emphasizes growth and enlargement.

more inclusive

Focuses on the inclusion of more elements or perspectives.

FAQs

How can I use "richer in scope" in a sentence?

Use "richer in scope" to compare the comprehensiveness of two subjects. For example, "The updated curriculum is "richer in scope" than the previous one, covering more topics in detail."

What phrases are similar to "richer in scope"?

Similar phrases include "more comprehensive", "broader in coverage", or "more extensive", which all suggest a greater breadth or depth of content.

Is it correct to say "richer in scope"?

Yes, "richer in scope" is a grammatically correct and understandable phrase. It effectively communicates that something has been expanded or enhanced in terms of its content or coverage.

What's the difference between "richer in scope" and "more detailed"?

"Richer in scope" implies a wider range of topics or elements, while "more detailed" suggests a deeper exploration of specific subjects. "Richer in scope" broadens the view, while "more detailed" intensifies it.