revocation

USAGE SUMMARY

The word revocation is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to the act of officially taking back or annulling something, such as a decree, decision, or promise. For example: "The town council had a meeting and decided to revoke their earlier decision to increase the city tax."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He claimed that HSBC used its bank in the United States as a gateway into the financial system for illicit money, and he threatened to push for a revocation of the bank's charter.In this section Dream on?

The Economist

Japan was disappointed that while in Tokyo he did not call for its revocation.

The Economist

Its revocation prompted counter-protests by Hindu nationalists.

The Economist

He claimed that HSBC used its bank in the United States as a gateway into the financial system for illicit money, and he threatened to push for a revocation of the bank's charter.Contrition was the primary response.

The Economist

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a distant federal cousin of the Repealer, duly produced a collection of edicts whose revocation, it said, would save businesses $1 billion a year.

The Economist

Another shareholder, Stanley Kops, this week filed a class-action suit against DaimlerChrysler, seeking damages and the revocation of the deal.Making a case will not be easy, according to most legal observers.

The Economist

A report by a parliamentary committee, published this week but written before the revocation of LMU's licence, describes the system as "poorly planned and ill thought out".

The Economist

"Some days now we don't get even one," says Victor Clavijo, a policeman.The law imposes stiff fines of up to nearly $15,000 and the revocation of the person's driving licence for up to 25 years for third-time offenders with the highest levels of alcohol in their blood.

The Economist

And the Czechs are narked because Mr Orban has implied that the decrees whereby ethnic Germans and Hungarians were expelled from Czechoslovakia and had their property taken after the second world war may need revocation.

The Economist

The revocation of Imperial's banking licence on August 26th may complicate things.

The Economist

The timing of the revocation of his citizenship does smack of pettiness.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "revocation" when referring to the formal or official cancellation of a decree, law, license, or privilege. It indicates a complete and often irreversible termination.

Common error

Avoid using "revocation" when you mean a temporary pause or suspension. "Revocation" implies a permanent end, while suspension indicates a temporary cessation that could be reinstated.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "revocation" is that of a noun. It commonly serves as the subject or object in a sentence, referring to the act of officially canceling or annulling something. As Ludwig AI explains, it indicates the act of officially taking back or annulling something.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Academia

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "revocation" is a noun referring to the act of officially canceling or annulling something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and suitable for formal writing. The word is frequently used in News & Media, Encyclopedias, and Scientific contexts, indicating a formal tone. When using "revocation", be mindful to differentiate it from temporary suspensions and reserve it for instances of complete and often irreversible termination. Related terms include "cancellation", "annulment", and "repeal", each with slightly different nuances. Remember to use "revocation" when you are referring to something formally rescinded or taken back.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cancellation

Focuses specifically on the act of voiding or annulling something, often an event or agreement.

annulment

Implies the act of legally invalidating something, such as a marriage or law.

rescission

Highlights the act of withdrawing or taking back an offer or contract.

repeal

Refers to the act of officially revoking or abolishing a law or regulation.

withdrawal

Emphasizes the act of removing or retracting something, like a statement or claim.

invalidation

Stresses the act of making something null and void, lacking legal force.

abrogation

Implies the act of abolishing or formally repealing a law or agreement.

voiding

Focuses on the act of making something ineffective or not legally binding.

nullification

Highlights the act of declaring something legally void and inoperative.

invalidation

Similar to "nullification", this emphasizes the act of rendering something without legal force or effect.

FAQs

How is "revocation" used in legal contexts?

"Revocation" is commonly used to describe the act of officially canceling or annulling a law, contract, or agreement, such as the revocation of a driver's license or the revocation of a treaty.

What's the difference between "revocation" and "cancellation"?

"Revocation" typically implies a formal or legal annulment, whereas "cancellation" is a more general term for stopping something, which may or may not have legal implications.

When can I use "repeal" instead of "revocation"?

The term "repeal" is best used specifically in the context of laws or statutes being officially revoked or abolished. It's often used in a legislative context.

What are some common examples of "revocation" in everyday life?

Examples include the revocation of a security clearance, the revocation of a will, or the revocation of citizenship. All of these involve the official taking back of something previously granted.