reviewed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used when referring to the act of examining something closely with another person in order to identify problems and potential solutions. For example, "The mayor and I reviewed the budget with great care to identify areas of potential cost reduction."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Reviewed with several other holiday films.

The New York Times

Evaluations are reviewed with the residents for formal feedback.

Stanford University

Your application will be reviewed with your unofficial transcripts.

University of California, Berkeley

The sessions are also videotaped and reviewed with the residents.

Stanford University

"The findings of the inspections were reviewed with Rolls-Royce.

The New York Times

Exemplary excerpts were selected and reviewed with the teacher.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

"Collections are always being reviewed with an eye toward gaps and duplications," she said.

The New York Times - Arts

"The transactions in question had been reviewed with our auditors and the accounting was proper".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

Nor is the research peer-reviewed, with the five-year earthquake prediction program being routinely renewed.

The New York Times - Science

The studies are peer-reviewed with massive study groups.

Harvard University

All submitted papers are peer-reviewed with high scientific standards.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed with", ensure that both the subject being reviewed and the element it's being reviewed with are clearly identified to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed with" when you only mean to examine something by itself. The phrase implies a comparative or collaborative assessment involving at least two distinct elements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed with" functions as a verb phrase indicating an action of examination or assessment performed in conjunction with another entity or factor. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in numerous contexts, denoting a process where something is scrutinized alongside something else for comparison, collaboration, or further understanding.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

32%

News & Media

31%

Science

37%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "reviewed with" is a versatile expression used to indicate that an assessment or examination occurred alongside another element, suggesting a collaborative or comparative analysis. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically sound and widely used. It commonly appears in academic, scientific, and news contexts, indicating a degree of formality. Key to effective usage is ensuring that both the subject being reviewed and the element it's being reviewed with are clearly identified. Understanding the scope of review is essential to avoid misapplication. In summary, "reviewed with" is a valuable tool for expressing thorough and contextualized evaluations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessed together with

Similar to examining alongside, but emphasizing a formal evaluation.

studied alongside

Emphasizes the academic nature of comparison and analysis.

examined alongside

Focuses on a side-by-side examination, emphasizing comparison.

checked in tandem with

Indicates actions done at the same time and place.

evaluated with respect to

Emphasizes judging the value of something in relation to another.

analyzed in light of

Focuses on how one thing helps to understand another.

interpreted in relation to

Highlights how the meaning of one thing is understood based on another.

considered in conjunction with

Highlights a more formal or legal consideration of two elements together.

verified in coordination with

Implies a cooperative effort to confirm something.

compared and contrasted with

Highlights the process of finding both similarities and differences.

FAQs

How can I use "reviewed with" in a sentence?

You can use "reviewed with" to indicate that something was examined in conjunction or alongside something else. For example, "The data was reviewed with the research team" or "The contract was reviewed with the legal department."

What are some alternatives to "reviewed with"?

Alternatives include "examined alongside", "considered in conjunction with", or "assessed together with", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "reviewed by" instead of "reviewed with"?

While "reviewed by" indicates who performed the review, "reviewed with" suggests a collaborative or comparative element in the reviewing process. They have slightly different meanings and are not always interchangeable.

What does "reviewed with an eye toward" mean?

"Reviewed with an eye toward" means that something is examined with a specific goal or outcome in mind. For example, "Future exhibitions are being "reviewed with" an eye toward cost cutting" suggests that the review's purpose is to find ways to reduce expenses.