reviewed positively

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewed positively" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing feedback or evaluations that are favorable or supportive in nature. Example: "The new product was reviewed positively by several industry experts, highlighting its innovative features and user-friendly design."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

21 human-written examples

The episode was reviewed positively by both the audience and professional reviewers.

Wikipedia

The album was reviewed positively and widely, but Lopatin now says that it "works as a sculpture, but it's not me".

The New Yorker

Given that her books fall into the oft-dismissed category of genre fiction, Flynn has had extraordinary critical success with Gone Girl, which was reviewed positively in the literary press and named by the New York Times as a book of the year.

The Guardian - Books

Tscheltzoff says his stock photo service Fotolia (which Mike Arrington has reviewed positively) proves the "micropayments for content" model can work.

TechCrunch

The new version of the Nintendo 3DS XL has been reviewed positively by many who've had access to the original Japanese version, but so far games that support the new buttons are limited.

TechCrunch

It sold well and was reviewed positively by most critics.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

39 human-written examples

And although the iPhone user is not told to review positively and fuelmyapp says it will not view a negative reviewer any differently to a positive one, you have to wonder if that will work.

TechCrunch

Even by the time he was in his mid-40s and had built a reputation in his own country, a UK broadsheet critic could declare without embarrassment that he had never heard of Kentridge when reviewing, positively, his 1999 show at London's Serpentine gallery.

The Guardian - Books

Paul Gilman, the agency's associate administrator for research and development, defended the grants program, noting that last year the National Research Council, the research arm of the National Academy of Sciences, reviewed it positively.

The New York Times

If stars get on stage, they should be judged for their work, and reviewed however positively or negatively as their performance may warrant.

Huffington Post

Ars Technica reviewed it positively, citing its organized interface, low resource usage, and its status as freeware.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed positively", ensure that the subject of the review is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. For example: "The film was reviewed positively by critics".

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed positively" without specifying who did the reviewing. For instance, instead of saying "The product was reviewed positively", specify "The product was reviewed positively by customers" or "... by industry experts". This adds credibility and context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed positively" functions as an adverbial modifier describing the manner in which something was reviewed. It indicates that the review was conducted in a favorable or approving way. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely understood.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Wiki

39%

Science

8%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "reviewed positively" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that something has received a favorable evaluation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It's versatile, fitting into both formal and informal contexts, though specifying the source of the positive review enhances clarity and credibility. While alternatives like "received well" and "praised by critics" exist, "reviewed positively" remains a straightforward and widely understood option. Predominantly found in News & Media and Wiki contexts, it signals that the subject in question has garnered positive feedback, influencing audience perception.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received well

Focuses on the reception rather than the review itself.

praised by critics

Highlights the positive opinion of professional reviewers.

met with acclaim

Emphasizes the enthusiastic approval received.

favorably assessed

Uses a more formal tone to indicate a positive evaluation.

given a good critique

Highlights that the critique was good.

got a thumbs up

Uses an informal expression for approval.

enjoyed positive reception

Focuses on the positive way something was received.

highly commended

Suggests a strong level of praise or approval.

rated highly

Indicates a high score or rating was given.

garnered positive feedback

Highlights that the feedback received was positive.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "reviewed positively"?

You can use alternatives like "received well", "praised by critics", or "met with acclaim" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "positively reviewed" or "reviewed positively"?

Both "positively reviewed" and "reviewed positively" are grammatically correct, but "reviewed positively" is slightly more common. The choice often depends on sentence flow and emphasis.

What does it mean when something is "reviewed positively"?

It means that the subject of the review—whether it's a book, movie, product, or service—has received favorable feedback and praise from reviewers or critics. It indicates that the review was generally favorable.

How can I use "reviewed positively" in a sentence?

You might say, "The new restaurant was reviewed positively by local food critics, leading to a surge in reservations," or "The software update was reviewed positively for its improved user interface and stability".