reviewed of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewed of" is not correct and not usable in written English.
It seems to be a mistaken combination of words and does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The report was reviewed of the previous findings." (This is incorrect; it should be "The report was reviewed for the previous findings.")

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Where it will be reviewed, of course.

The New York Times

"Trouble the Water," which won the grand jury prize for best documentary at the Sundance Film Festival and opens on Friday, is one of the best reviewed of these movies.

The New York Times

Andrew Bujalski, whose "Funny Ha Ha" and "Mutual Appreciation" are the best reviewed of the crop, is to write and direct an adaptation of "Indecision," a novel by Benjamin Kunkel, for the producer Scott Rudin.

The New York Times

In 2007 the ethics committee rejected only 2% out of 1,014 cases it reviewed of civil servants moving to new jobs.

The Economist

In a study, which they reviewed, of 123 subjects with no psychiatric history who were given the test, most at a California blood bank, 16percentt scored in the abnormal range on the test's schizophrenia index -- far higher than the 1percentt incidence of the illness in the general population indicated in other surveys.

The New York Times - Science

A total of 312 papers were reviewed, of which 79 met the inclusion criteria.

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

The current start-of-the-art developments are reviewed of rational design strategies for synthesizing micro/nano-structured anode materials.

Energy Storage Materials

Microbiology records were reviewed of all the culture-proven endophthalmitis cases after OGI treated at L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India, between January 2006 and March 2013.

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

Previous literature on data collection, data management, and languages for querying and analysing of tweets has been reviewed, of which only some are reported here [6].

Journal of Big Data

Basic features are reviewed of the chemical engineering problems faced in the vitrification of the high-level radioactive liquid wastes resulting from the reprocessing of nuclear fuel.

Chemical Engineering Science

Reviewed of the literature of sense of the place was conducted to rediscover the fundamental notions of place, perception and experience.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct preposition after "reviewed". The most common and grammatically sound options are "reviewed for" or "review of". If you intend to show cause, prefer the former, and the latter to show object of analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed of". This is a common mistake that leads to grammatically incorrect sentences. Always double-check your preposition choice after "reviewed" to ensure clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed of" is grammatically incorrect and does not function properly in English. It's an improper combination of a past participle with an incorrect preposition. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, indicating that the phrase isn't usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reviewed of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is not usable in written English. While it may appear in various contexts, such as scientific and news articles, it remains a misuse of the English language. Correct alternatives include "reviewed for" or "review of", depending on the intended meaning. Always ensure that the preposition used is appropriate to maintain grammatical correctness and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reviewed for

Corrects the grammatical error by using the correct preposition after 'reviewed'.

reviewed regarding

Replaces 'of' with 'regarding' to specify the subject under review.

assessed for

Substitutes 'reviewed' with 'assessed', maintaining the preposition 'for'.

examined for

Uses 'examined' instead of 'reviewed' to indicate a closer inspection.

analysis of

Replaces the verb 'reviewed' with the noun 'analysis', shifting the sentence structure.

evaluation of

Substitutes 'reviewed' with 'evaluation', indicating a judgment or appraisal.

inspection of

Uses 'inspection' to denote a detailed examination.

audit of

Replaces 'reviewed' with 'audit' for a formal examination of records.

study of

Substitutes 'reviewed' with 'study' to emphasize the process of learning and understanding.

consideration of

Replaces 'reviewed' with 'consideration', indicating careful thought and attention.

FAQs

How to properly use "reviewed" in a sentence?

Use "reviewed for" to indicate the purpose of the review, such as "The document was "reviewed for" errors." Alternatively, use "review of" to indicate the subject being reviewed, such as "This is a "review of" the literature".

What are common mistakes to avoid when using "reviewed"?

A common mistake is using the incorrect preposition, such as "reviewed of" instead of "reviewed for" or "review of". Always ensure you use the correct preposition to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Which is correct, "reviewed of" or "review of"?

"Review of" is the correct phrase. "Reviewed of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided.

What can I say instead of "reviewed of"?

Since "reviewed of" is incorrect, use alternatives like ""reviewed for"" or "analysis of" depending on the intended meaning.