Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

reviewed for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"reviewed for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to highlight that particular action has been completed for something. Example: I have reviewed the documents for accuracy.

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The paper is being reviewed for publication.

News & Media

The New York Times

SAT questions are reviewed for Eurocentrism, too.

News & Media

The New York Times

Noted critic Tobi Tobias reviewed for bloomberg.com.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

30 Jan 2017 Reviewed for CIAO 4.9.

17 Dec 2014 Reviewed for CIAO 4.7.

Reviewed for Workday purposes 6/20/2017.

25 Nov 2013 Reviewed for CIAO 4.6.

16 Dec 2014 Reviewed for CIAO4.7.

10 Dec 2014 Reviewed for CIAO 4.7.

22 Dec 2014 Reviewed for CIAO 4.7.

* Reviewed for Workday purposes 6/6/2017.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed for", specify the criteria or purpose of the review to provide clarity. For example, "The manuscript was reviewed for clarity and accuracy."

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed for" without specifying what aspects were under review. Instead of saying "The document was reviewed for something", clearly state the purpose like "The document was reviewed for compliance with regulations."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed for" functions as a verb phrase indicating that a subject has been examined or assessed to determine if it meets certain criteria or possesses certain qualities. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples that demonstrate this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

33%

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reviewed for" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that something has been examined or assessed against specific criteria. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase functions primarily to convey that an evaluation process has taken place, often to ensure quality, accuracy, or compliance. Its neutral formality makes it suitable for diverse contexts, including academic, scientific, and news reporting. While versatile, it's crucial to clearly specify what aspects are under review to avoid vagueness.

FAQs

How can I use "reviewed for" in a sentence?

Use "reviewed for" to indicate that something has undergone examination to assess a specific quality or meet certain criteria. For example, "The application was reviewed for completeness" or "The data was reviewed for accuracy".

What are some alternatives to "reviewed for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "scrutinized for", "evaluated for", "assessed for", or "examined for".

Is there a difference between "reviewed for" and "edited for"?

"Reviewed for" suggests an assessment or examination, while "edited for" implies changes were made to improve something. You "review for" accuracy, but you "edit for" grammar.

What does it mean when something is "being reviewed for" something?

It means that a process of examination or assessment is currently underway. For example, "The proposal is being reviewed for funding" indicates that the funding application is currently being assessed.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: