Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
reviewed for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"reviewed for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to highlight that particular action has been completed for something. Example: I have reviewed the documents for accuracy.
✓ Grammatically correct
Academia
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The paper is being reviewed for publication.
News & Media
SAT questions are reviewed for Eurocentrism, too.
News & Media
Noted critic Tobi Tobias reviewed for bloomberg.com.
Encyclopedias
30 Jan 2017 Reviewed for CIAO 4.9.
Academia
17 Dec 2014 Reviewed for CIAO 4.7.
Academia
Reviewed for Workday purposes 6/20/2017.
Academia
25 Nov 2013 Reviewed for CIAO 4.6.
Academia
16 Dec 2014 Reviewed for CIAO4.7.
Academia
10 Dec 2014 Reviewed for CIAO 4.7.
Academia
22 Dec 2014 Reviewed for CIAO 4.7.
Academia
* Reviewed for Workday purposes 6/6/2017.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "reviewed for", specify the criteria or purpose of the review to provide clarity. For example, "The manuscript was reviewed for clarity and accuracy."
Common error
Avoid using "reviewed for" without specifying what aspects were under review. Instead of saying "The document was reviewed for something", clearly state the purpose like "The document was reviewed for compliance with regulations."
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "reviewed for" functions as a verb phrase indicating that a subject has been examined or assessed to determine if it meets certain criteria or possesses certain qualities. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples that demonstrate this usage.
Frequent in
Academia
33%
Science
30%
News & Media
25%
Less common in
Formal & Business
7%
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "reviewed for" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that something has been examined or assessed against specific criteria. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase functions primarily to convey that an evaluation process has taken place, often to ensure quality, accuracy, or compliance. Its neutral formality makes it suitable for diverse contexts, including academic, scientific, and news reporting. While versatile, it's crucial to clearly specify what aspects are under review to avoid vagueness.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
scrutinized for
Implies a more critical and detailed examination.
evaluated for
Focuses on assessing the value or quality.
assessed for
Similar to evaluated, but can also refer to assessing potential risks or impacts.
examined for
Suggests a careful and thorough investigation.
checked for
Indicates a quick verification process.
inspected for
Implies a physical examination or close observation.
audited for
Specifically refers to a formal financial or procedural review.
investigated for
Suggests a formal inquiry or search for wrongdoing.
analysed for
Implies a detailed study of something to discover more about it.
considered for
Means to think carefully about something, typically before making a decision.
FAQs
How can I use "reviewed for" in a sentence?
Use "reviewed for" to indicate that something has undergone examination to assess a specific quality or meet certain criteria. For example, "The application was reviewed for completeness" or "The data was reviewed for accuracy".
What are some alternatives to "reviewed for"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "scrutinized for", "evaluated for", "assessed for", or "examined for".
Is there a difference between "reviewed for" and "edited for"?
"Reviewed for" suggests an assessment or examination, while "edited for" implies changes were made to improve something. You "review for" accuracy, but you "edit for" grammar.
What does it mean when something is "being reviewed for" something?
It means that a process of examination or assessment is currently underway. For example, "The proposal is being reviewed for funding" indicates that the funding application is currently being assessed.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested