reviewed information

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewed information" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to information that has been examined or assessed for accuracy or relevance. Example: "After analyzing the reviewed information, we can conclude that the project is on track."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

51 human-written examples

This offers a consistent approach to disease and treatment information, enabling HPs to provide standardised peer reviewed information leaflets, and direct patients to quality-reviewed websites according to individual needs.

British Journal of Cancer

The standard states that while the underwriters have reviewed information in the documents, they cannot guarantee its "accuracy or completeness".

The New York Times

Morrow continued: You will hear that enemies of the United States reviewed information provided by P.F.C. Manning.

The New Yorker

But at the cabinet meeting, ministers reviewed information implicating Mr. Arafat, Israeli officials said, without disclosing details.

The New York Times

Intelligence agencies reviewed information about the satellite launching last fall, but concluded that it warranted no action.

The New York Times - Science

The Joint Inquiry therefore reviewed information the intelligence community held before Sept. 11 that suggested that an attack within the United States was a possibility.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

9 human-written examples

"Our intelligence community has carefully reviewed and re-reviewed information regarding this attack and I will tell you it is more than mindful of the Iraq experience.

Los Angeles Times

"Our intelligence community has carefully reviewed and re-reviewed information regarding this attack and I will tell you it is more than mindful of the Iraq experience," Kerry added.

Los Angeles Times

Public submissions to the U.S. EPA and peer-reviewed information (including health assessments developed by other organizations, review articles, and independent analyses of the health effects data) were also considered for inclusion.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Increasingly, the availability of peer-reviewed information has shortened the period given to literature review from months to days, and, for many projects, the vast majority of relevant information is digitally available.

Emerging Health Threats Journal

The major limitation of integrative reviews is the potential for bias from its inclusion of non-peer-reviewed information.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed information", clearly state who conducted the review to establish credibility and context.

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed information" without specifying the scope or criteria of the review. Be specific about what aspects of the information were reviewed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed information" typically functions as a noun phrase, where "reviewed" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "information". It describes information that has undergone a process of examination or assessment. The examples from Ludwig showcase its use in various contexts to indicate that information has been scrutinized.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

42%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reviewed information" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that indicates information has been examined or assessed. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. It is most commonly found in scientific and news-related contexts. To ensure clarity, specify who conducted the review and what criteria were used. Alternative phrases include "examined data" and "assessed details". By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "reviewed information" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

examined data

Focuses on a close and careful inspection of the data.

assessed details

Emphasizes the evaluation and judgment of the details.

analyzed facts

Highlights the process of breaking down facts for scrutiny.

evaluated material

Stresses the act of determining the value or significance of the material.

studied documents

Implies a more in-depth and prolonged examination of documents.

scrutinized evidence

Suggests a critical and detailed inspection of the evidence.

investigated findings

Implies a systematic or formal inquiry into the findings.

checked facts

Highlights the act of verifying the accuracy of the facts.

processed intelligence

Focuses on gathering and converting intelligence into usable form.

digested knowledge

Suggests internalizing and understanding the knowledge presented.

FAQs

How can I use "reviewed information" in a sentence?

You can use "reviewed information" to describe data or content that has been examined, such as "Based on the "reviewed information", we made our decision".

What's a good alternative to "reviewed information"?

Alternatives include phrases like "examined data", "assessed details", or "analyzed facts", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "information that was reviewed" or "reviewed information"?

"Reviewed information" is a concise and grammatically sound option. "Information that was reviewed" is also correct, but it is more verbose.

What does it mean when someone says they "reviewed the information"?

It means they have examined and considered the information, usually to make a decision or form an opinion. Depending on context, reviewed could suggest anything from a quick glance to a thorough and systematic assessment.