reviewed in full

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewed in full" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been examined or assessed completely and thoroughly. Example: "The report was reviewed in full before the final decision was made."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Included articles were reviewed in full by two reviewers independently (ME and SJ).

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Selected articles were reviewed in full and independently assessed for eligibility by the same two reviewers.

British Medical Journal

Potentially relevant articles were acquired and reviewed in full text.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

examined each of the abstracts returned by the search and screened for relevant articles to be reviewed in full.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Eleven manuscripts were reviewed in full.

Globalization and Health

3226 abstracts were identified and 291 articles reviewed in full.

BMC Geriatrics

Potentially eligible citations were reviewed in full (MLM or NH).

BMC Cancer

Articles fulfilling inclusion criteria were kept and reviewed in full.

Global Health Action

A total of 15 articles were reviewed in full.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Abstracts were reviewed, and relevant articles were reviewed in full.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Full texts were obtained of the abstracts that met the eligibility criteria, these were read and reviewed in-full and re-examined for the eligibility criteria.

BMC Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed in full", ensure the context clearly indicates what was being reviewed and the scope of the review. For example, specify "the manuscript was reviewed in full" rather than just "it was reviewed in full".

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed in full" as a generic phrase. Be specific about the aspect or document being reviewed to provide clarity and avoid ambiguity. Instead of just stating that something was "reviewed in full", specify what elements were assessed or the criteria used during the review process.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed in full" typically functions as a verb phrase, often used to describe the action taken on a document, article, or proposal. It emphasizes the thoroughness of the review process. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English, indicating a complete and thorough assessment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reviewed in full" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression, primarily within scientific and academic domains. As Ludwig AI indicates, it accurately conveys that something has been thoroughly and comprehensively examined. While alternatives like "thoroughly examined" or "comprehensively assessed" exist, "reviewed in full" maintains its relevance and clarity when indicating a detailed review process. Remembering to provide context regarding the subject of the review will ensure clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

thoroughly examined

Focuses on the depth of examination rather than the stage of review.

comprehensively assessed

Emphasizes the breadth of the assessment, covering all relevant aspects.

carefully scrutinized

Highlights the attention to detail and critical evaluation involved.

fully evaluated

Stresses the completeness of the evaluation process.

completely analyzed

Emphasizes the analytical aspect of the review, focusing on understanding the components and their relationships.

detailed assessment

Highlights the level of detail of the assessment.

in-depth analysis

Focuses on the depth and intensity of the analysis conducted.

critically appraised

Focuses on a formal assessment of the quality of the information.

closely inspected

Emphasizes a meticulous and careful observation.

fully investigated

Focuses on an official or systematic examination of a situation or event so as to discover the truth.

FAQs

How do I use "reviewed in full" in a sentence?

You can use "reviewed in full" to indicate that something has been thoroughly examined. For example, "The research paper was "reviewed in full" by the editorial board before publication."

What are some alternatives to "reviewed in full"?

Alternatives include "thoroughly examined", "comprehensively assessed", or "carefully scrutinized". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it redundant to say "reviewed in full detail"?

While "reviewed in full detail" isn't grammatically incorrect, it can be seen as somewhat redundant. The phrase "reviewed in full" already implies a comprehensive examination, so adding "detail" may not be necessary.

What's the difference between "reviewed in full" and "summarized"?

"Reviewed in full" implies a complete and thorough examination of something. On the other hand, "summarized" means condensing the main points. A full review aims to understand every aspect, while a summary provides a brief overview.