reviewed at length

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reviewed at length" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a thorough examination or analysis of a topic, document, or piece of work. Example: "The report was reviewed at length by the committee before making a final decision."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

The program is reviewed at length.

The New Yorker

About 100 places are reviewed at length.

The New York Times - Travel

I also loved Karl Ove Knausgaard's book "My Struggle" (Archipelago), which I reviewed at length in the magazine.

The New Yorker

No, immediately after the ambush, I reviewed at length everything that happened with each of the Marines involved.

The New York Times

In that case the authorities upon this point are reviewed at length, including the case of Stanley v. Schwalby, 162 U. S. 255, 40 L. ed.

Cornell University

The legislative history of § 2255 is reviewed at length in the opinion which Mr. Chief Justice Vinson wrote for the Court in United States v. Hayman, 342 U.S. 205, 72 S.Ct.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

That science is worth reviewing at length.

The New York Times

The normal state electronic and magnetic properties of alkali metal intercalated fullerides (AMIF) are still only partially understood and are reviewed at great length [4, 5].

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics

Some of the more well-known mechanisms of retention and diversification include neofunctionalization (Ohno 1970) and subfunctionalization (Hughes 1994; Force et al. 1999), both of which have been reviewed at great length in the literature (Innan and Kondrashov 2010).

Genome Biology and Evolution

Although the study design attempted to minimize limiting factors, it should be recognized that much of the information in the CANDOO database relied on factual recall from patients, some of which was reviewed at considerable length after the experience had occurred.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Each track on the album (Track records; I will be reviewing it at length soon) shows the world as felt by one very singular, very ordinary person.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reviewed at length", ensure that the context supports the claim of a detailed and thorough examination. Provide evidence or specific examples to reinforce this claim.

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed at length" if the review was cursory or superficial. Using the phrase implies a significant commitment to thoroughness, so reserve it for situations where a genuine, detailed examination occurred.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed at length" functions as a descriptive element, typically modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate that something has undergone a comprehensive and thorough examination. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this usage is grammatically correct and widely accepted.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

35%

Academia

18%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reviewed at length" is a phrase used to describe something that has been thoroughly and comprehensively examined. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread acceptance. It is commonly used in academic, scientific, and news contexts to convey the depth and rigor of a review process. When using this phrase, ensure that the context accurately reflects a detailed and thorough examination. Alternatives such as "thoroughly examined", "extensively analyzed", and "comprehensively assessed" can be used to express similar meanings, depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. However avoid using the expression if the review was not actually an "at length" one.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

thoroughly examined

Focuses on the completeness of the examination, highlighting the meticulous nature of the review.

extensively analyzed

Emphasizes the depth of analysis conducted, suggesting a detailed investigation of the subject matter.

comprehensively assessed

Indicates a broad and inclusive evaluation, covering all relevant aspects.

detailed examination

Highlights the level of detail involved in the review process.

in-depth analysis

Suggests a profound and thorough exploration of the topic.

fully investigated

Stresses the completeness of the inquiry, implying a thorough search for information.

carefully scrutinized

Emphasizes the attentiveness and precision applied during the review.

closely evaluated

Highlights the meticulous nature of the evaluation process.

critically assessed

Focuses on the evaluative aspect, highlighting objective judgement.

deeply explored

Indicates an intense and thorough exploration of the subject.

FAQs

How can I use "reviewed at length" in a sentence?

You can use "reviewed at length" to describe a document, proposal, or topic that has been thoroughly examined and discussed, as in "The committee "reviewed at length" the proposed budget before making a decision".

What's a more formal alternative to "reviewed at length"?

Alternatives include "extensively analyzed", "comprehensively assessed", or "thoroughly examined". Each emphasizes a detailed and complete evaluation.

Is there a difference between "reviewed at length" and "briefly reviewed"?

Yes, "reviewed at length" implies a thorough and detailed examination, while "briefly reviewed" indicates a superficial or cursory look. The former suggests a significant time investment and depth of analysis, while the latter does not.

What are some common contexts where "reviewed at length" is used?

"Reviewed at length" is often used in academic, scientific, and professional settings to describe the process of thoroughly examining research papers, legal documents, or business proposals.