reviewed against

USAGE SUMMARY

"reviewed against" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to refer to the comparison of something with a standard or criteria. For example, "The essay was reviewed against the university's standards and found to be satisfactory."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Returned articles were reviewed against inclusion and exclusion criteria by three reviewers (D.G., K.E., and P.C).

Diabetes Care

Retrieved citations were reviewed against the question-specific inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

The results obtained are reviewed against classical design methods.

Ocean Engineering

Late Cenozoic landform development is then reviewed against these events.

Treatise on Geomorphology

Once set, a new enrollment target will stay in place for three years, and then be reviewed against program outcomes.

University of California, Berkeley

Charts of all patients diagnosed with asthma during 3-month study period were retrospectively reviewed against predefined outcomes.

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

However, when reviewed against other edge angle analyses, against a functional backdrop, their edge angle in isolation cannot explain their appearance and subsequent use.

Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Applications for more licences to sell alcohol should be reviewed against a background of considering public health and street crime; we must reduce the availability of alcohol by reducing the number of places selling it.

The Guardian - Opinion

In early 2012, journalists were assured that this is not the case, but the Guardian's deletions procedure will need to be reviewed against the broad principles of the new policy.

The Guardian

The whole process represents an MBO program of textbook purity: each staff member, patient, and patient category (e.g., alcoholics) has objectives for both diagnosis and treatment, which are reviewed against actual results every three months.

Harvard Business Review

These units were reviewed against the current safety practices and based on this review some recommendations are made to bring the safety levels of these vintage units on par with the recently authorized plants.

Nuclear Engineering and Design

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "reviewed against" when you want to emphasize a formal or systematic comparison of something against a specific standard or set of criteria. This phrasing is common in academic, scientific, and professional contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "reviewed against" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "checked" or "looked at" are more appropriate in those contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reviewed against" functions as a prepositional phrase often used as part of a passive construction. It indicates that something has undergone a process of examination and comparison with a set of standards, criteria, or requirements. Ludwig AI indicates this is a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reviewed against" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed term, especially within scientific, news, and formal business contexts, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It signifies a formal comparison or assessment against specified criteria. While interchangeable with alternatives like "assessed against" or "evaluated in light of", it's best reserved for formal writing. When crafting content, remember to use it accurately to convey thoroughness and objectivity in evaluations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessed against

Replaces "reviewed" with "assessed", emphasizing a more formal evaluation.

checked against

Replaces "reviewed" with "checked", indicating a simpler verification process.

evaluated in light of

Substitutes "reviewed against" with a phrase that highlights the context of the evaluation.

compared with

Uses "compared" instead of "reviewed", focusing on the act of finding similarities and differences.

measured against

Emphasizes the quantification aspect of the review process.

benchmarked against

Implies a comparison against an industry standard or best practice.

examined with respect to

Replaces "reviewed against" with a more formal and detailed examination.

scrutinized in relation to

Highlights a thorough and critical examination of something.

considered in the context of

Focuses on understanding something within a specific framework.

weighed against

Implies a careful consideration of the pros and cons in relation to something else.

FAQs

How can I use "reviewed against" in a sentence?

You can use "reviewed against" to describe a process where something is compared to a standard. For example, "The application was "reviewed against" the eligibility criteria".

What are some alternatives to "reviewed against"?

Alternatives include "assessed against", "evaluated in light of", or "checked against", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "review against" instead of "reviewed against"?

While "review against" might be understood in some contexts, ""reviewed against"" is the grammatically correct and more common phrasing when referring to a past action or state.

What's the difference between "reviewed against" and "compared to"?

"Reviewed against" implies a formal evaluation against specific criteria, while "compared to" suggests a broader assessment of similarities and differences.