review submissions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "review submissions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of evaluating or assessing submitted work, documents, or applications. Example: "The committee will review submissions for the grant by the end of the month."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

The curators review submissions daily.

The New York Times - Arts

There are also fears that panellists do not have the time to review submissions effectively.

The Guardian

Others review submissions free, too, which takes care of most of the editing.

The New York Times

We aim to review submissions to GuardianWitness as quickly as possible.

The Guardian

After each deadline, the Grants Team will review submissions to verify project eligibility and completeness.

Stanford University

The remaining three sections describe more broadly how the scientific and medical disciplines in OCTGT review submissions for adenoviral vector-based products.

Adenoviral Vectors for Gene Therapy

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

28 human-written examples

When reviewing submissions, reviewers are asked to assign a score for each criterion based on the descriptive text next to the "radio button" on the evaluation from.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

The Biology Direct system allows publication of papers with 'no comment' reviews, when a reviewer chooses that option or when they miss the deadline for review submission.

Nature

This review, details of which have not been publicly announced, is clearly intended to shape BIS's spending review submission to HM Treasury.

The Guardian

Authors may register with the Philosophy of Music Education Review, review submission guidelines, and submit manuscripts for consideration via the journal's online submissions website: http://www.pmer.iu.edu.

Johns Hopkins University

If you are uncertain if submission deadline applies to your continuing review submission, please contact the IRB office at 773-834-0402 or [email protected]

University of Chicago

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider specifying who is responsible for the "review submissions" process to ensure accountability.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by clearly defining the scope and criteria of the "review submissions" process. Otherwise, the review might lack focus and effectiveness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "review submissions" functions primarily as a verb phrase followed by a noun. It describes the act of evaluating items that have been submitted, as confirmed by Ludwig's examples showcasing diverse usage contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Academia

30%

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "review submissions" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase for describing the process of evaluating submitted materials. Ludwig AI confirms its wide applicability across various contexts, particularly in academic, news, and scientific domains. While versatile, clarity in defining the scope and criteria of the review process is essential. Alternative phrases such as "evaluate entries" or "assess applications" can be used depending on the specific context. By understanding its function, purpose, and register, writers can effectively incorporate "review submissions" into their work.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evaluate entries

Focuses on judging the quality or value of items entered for consideration, such as in a contest or competition.

assess applications

Specifically refers to the evaluation of formal requests or proposals, often in the context of admissions or job hiring.

examine proposals

Implies a detailed inspection of suggestions or plans put forward for consideration or acceptance.

scrutinize documents

Suggests a thorough and critical examination of written materials to identify errors or inconsistencies.

consider applications

A more general term for taking applications into account, without necessarily implying a detailed analysis.

judge entries

Similar to 'evaluate entries', but emphasizes the act of making a judgment or decision about the submitted items.

process applications

Focuses on the administrative steps involved in handling applications, including review.

go through entries

A more informal way of saying 'review entries', implying a sequential examination.

check submissions

Suggests verifying the completeness or correctness of submitted items.

audit documentation

Implies an official examination of records to ensure accuracy and compliance.

FAQs

How can I use "review submissions" in a sentence?

You can use "review submissions" to describe the process of evaluating documents or applications. For example, "The committee will "review submissions" for the grant by the end of the month."

What can I say instead of "review submissions"?

You can use alternatives like "evaluate entries", "assess applications", or "examine proposals" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "review submissions" or "reviewing submissions"?

Both "review submissions" and "reviewing submissions" can be correct, but they function differently. "Review submissions" is a noun phrase where "review" acts as a verb, while "reviewing submissions" uses the gerund form, indicating an ongoing action.

What's the difference between "review submissions" and "approve submissions"?

"Review submissions" means to evaluate them, while "approve submissions" means to officially accept or authorize them. Reviewing is part of the process that may lead to approval.